Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 4061 - 4080
of 13,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2019, 8:28 am
Under Thornburg v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 2:51 am
That would make the case for an anti-suit injunction or a stay much weaker, and the District Court for the Central District of California in TCL v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
GLICKSMAN Stanford, California: Stanford Economics and Finance, 2011 KF3790 .E27 2011 See Catalog Children -- Legal status, laws, etc. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 2:55 pm
Chamber of Commerce of the United States et al. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Next, Tillman sought to pursue legal action in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
15 Oct 2016, 1:10 pm
The FLSA applies to employees in many situations in this jurisdiction as well as in the state of California. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 9:08 pm
Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137, 177 (1803), and the Executive’s constitutional duty “to preserve the national security,” United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 8:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 3:24 pm
The case of State v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 3:24 pm
The case of State v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:22 am
United States, 529 U.S. 334, 338 (2000)).Montgomery v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
Following the Ninth Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:58 am
Sanchez Valle, describing it as an “explosive” filing that “has inexplicably undermined nearly 70 years of the United States’ legal and political commitment about the status of Puerto Rico and the right of the people there to local self-government. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 11:48 am
The first basis for the court’s ruling was the United States Supreme Court decision in Pennsylvania v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:26 pm
Exemption of NextGen procedures from environmental review is not the only issue raised by the FAA Reauthorization legislation set to be approved by the United States Senate on Monday, February 6 at 5:30 p.m. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 7:16 am
Let’s start with United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 10:38 am
He said immigrants come to the United States to work, often trying to stay under the radar of authorities and away from criminal activity to avoid deportation. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 8:39 am
The United States Supreme Court in the landmark case of Arizona v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 7:00 pm
(“BADD”) was sued in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California for allegedly violating the Internal Do Not Call (“DNC”) compliance provisions of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”). [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 6:55 am
Earlier this month, the California Supreme Court provided some guidance on the issue in Rose v. [read post]
