Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 4061 - 4080 of 15,305
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am by John Elwood
§ 315(b)’s time bar did not apply; and (2) whether 35 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 8:19 am by Public Employment Law Press
" * Interruption means separation from employment as a police officer "by reason of such officer's leave of absence, resignation or removal, other than removal for cause" (see General Municipal Law §209-q[1][c]). [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Theberge-Lindsay v. 3395022 Canada Inc. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 5:30 am by Bill Marler
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 2:17 pm by Erik J. Heels
Clocktower Law LLC (Clocktower) conducts conflict-of-interest checks for each new client. b. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 12:42 pm by Kirk Jenkins
  Citing Timberlane, the Court balanced five factors with respect to comity: (1) the vital national interests of each state; (b) the extent and the nature of the hardship that inconsistent enforcement actions would impose upon the defendant; (c) the extent to which the required conduct is to take place in the territory of the other state; (d) the nationality of the person; and (e) the extent to which enforcement by action of either state can… [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 12:42 pm by Kirk Jenkins
  Citing Timberlane, the Court balanced five factors with respect to comity: (1) the vital national interests of each state; (b) the extent and the nature of the hardship that inconsistent enforcement actions would impose upon the defendant; (c) the extent to which the required conduct is to take place in the territory of the other state; (d) the nationality of the person; and (e) the extent to which enforcement by action of either state can… [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 12:42 pm by Kirk Jenkins
  Citing Timberlane, the Court balanced five factors with respect to comity: (1) the vital national interests of each state; (b) the extent and the nature of the hardship that inconsistent enforcement actions would impose upon the defendant; (c) the extent to which the required conduct is to take place in the territory of the other state; (d) the nationality of the person; and (e) the extent to which enforcement by action of either state can… [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 1:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  And it’s gotten longer and longer b/c of © owners’ political power. [read post]