Search for: "State v. Character"
Results 4061 - 4080
of 7,502
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2019, 12:41 pm
Buehrle v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 10:55 am
" With respect to Holmberg's statement, "[t]hat's why the state bar is coming after him, again," the Supreme Court of Virginia's opinion in Morrissey v. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 9:25 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Suzanne Prentiss v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:22 am
By Daniel RichardsonDeSantis v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 10:15 am
Last week's decision in Carr v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 10:33 am
Indeed, while under Article 52(1)(a) CTMR the application date is the seminal moment for the examination invalidity grounds, examiners and Courts are free to consider any material subsequent to the date of application insofar as it enables conclusions to be drawn with regard to the situation as it was on that date [see the CJEU’s orders in Alcon v OHIM, in Case C-192/03P, and Torresan v OHIM, in Case C-5/10]. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 1:17 am
', Lars Brahms looks at the recent England and Wales High Court decision of Vestel Elektronik Sanayi v HEVC Advance LLC, which raised this question as well as the questions of what the proper basis would be for such a claim, and where this claim might be brought.Trade MarksGuestKat Nedim Malovic examines an intriguing decision from the General Court, which stated that the relevant public's attention is 'average at best' when assessing likelihood of… [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
The specific character of NFTs is to confer non-fungibility to a digital asset which is otherwise “fungible by default”. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
Well, Bulgaria is in the EU and an EUTM can be blocked from registration by a national mark from any EU Member State. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 10:25 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Mark Toliver v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm
Powe v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm
McAllen Hospitals, L.P. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 2:48 am
Justice Joseph Quinn's November 29, 2010 ruling in Bruni v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:54 pm
Co. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 5:03 am
Chief Justice Marshall, in Livingston v. [read post]
24 Oct 2015, 4:52 am
Drauglis v Kappa Map Group [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 6:47 am
Welch Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 12:44 pm
In my view the character of these observations are the same as observations that could be made by a non-doctor. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 7:38 am
Supreme Court has recognized that “exemptions for religious organizations from civil discrimination suits protect religious freedom by avoiding state interference with religious autonomy and practice,” the state high court noted, citing the 1987 decision in Corp. of Presiding Bishop of Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. [read post]
