Search for: "State v. Downs"
Results 4061 - 4080
of 40,925
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2008, 2:18 pm
Does 1-16, the John Doe case targeting students at the State University of New York at Albany, a third student has joined the two already fighting the RIAA's subpoena, and the students' attorney filed an amended memorandum of law which, among other things, incorporates the recent decision, handed down September 24, 2008, in Capitol v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 4:05 am
In Smith v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 10:53 am
State Water Resources Control Board (2023) 88 Cal.App.5th 874. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 7:58 am
–Van Buren v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 12:45 pm
To my mind, the highlight was the filing of a petition by seventeen states in Case No. 22-1081, Ohio v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:18 pm
In Brown v. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 6:48 am
The Town of Oyster Bay enacted this law to restrict immigrants from seeking work as day laborers.The case is Centro De La Comunidad v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 4:48 am
State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 4:37 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 3:58 pm
On the same day, the Court also handed down Premo v Moore which overturned another Ninth Circuit grant of a habeas corpus finding that that the Court did not afford sufficient deference to the ruling of the Oregon Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 8:29 am
US (Guest Blog Post) * Indianapolis Police Have Been “Blinded Lately Because They Shut Backpage Down” * Constitutional Challenge Against FOSTA Filed–Woodhull v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 4:01 am
State v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm
”), to knock down multiple arguments raised in opposition. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:08 pm
The opinion in United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:59 am
State v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 5:05 am
People v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 2:00 am
In Ohl-Marsters v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 7:02 am
Because “[t]he link between fantasy and intent is too tenuous for fantasy [alone] to be probative,” United States v. [read post]
