Search for: "State v. Favors" Results 4061 - 4080 of 37,519
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2022, 9:31 am by Mavrick Law Firm
  The plaintiff-employee may attempt to prove discrimination through circumstantial evidence by satisfying the United States Supreme Court’s burden-shifting framework set forth it its decision in McDonnell Douglas v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 11:30 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
A recent invocation of this faulty logic occurred in Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s questions during the November 2021 oral arguments in Dobbs v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 8:40 am by JURIST Staff
Four different judges penned reasons in Morgentaler, three of them in favor of finding the Code provisions unconstitutional. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:03 pm by Katelynn Catalano
Such requests arose following the leak of a Supreme Court draft opinion indicating that the Court may strike down Roe v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
During that time, laws that obviously and without strong policy reasons favor ophthalmologists and optometrists over opticians, laws that favor lawyers over professional debt adjustors, and laws that favor established businesses over newcomers have been rubber stamped.What of the compelled-speech First Amendment claim? [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:59 am by Robert Liles
As state hospice audit and efforts expand, some states have identified significant problems. [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:24 am by Emma Snell
Public opinion in Finland has shifted significantly in favor of joining NATO, from some 20 per cent in favor six months ago to nearly 80 per cent now. [read post]
11 May 2022, 3:51 pm by Joseph Fishkin
It needs to reach out and show that a different set of constitutional ideas is available for the public to grab hold of, and for Congress and state legislatures and state courts to consider, as we begin to build a future constitutional politics on foundations from the Ninth Amendment to the Thirteenth to the Fourteenth, in response to the Court’s decision in Dobbs.4. [read post]