Search for: "State v. Files" Results 4061 - 4080 of 91,591
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2008, 8:45 am
On Friday the Solicitor General’s office filed this invitation brief in No. 07-539, Progress Energy v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 1:52 am
Check out the new ASIL Insight analyzing Jogi v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 11:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm by Glenn Reynolds
WISCONSIN JUDGE RULES STATE CONCEALED-WEAPON BAN UNCONSTITUTIONAL: “In light of the landmark Supreme Court ruling in McDonald v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 2:34 am
A local blogger, NW Republican, weighs in on the American Federation of Teachers, AFT, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 12:21 pm
 You can file your state claims in state court if you want, as long as the federal claims get filed where they belong. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
He stated (at paragraph 39) that: "the only principle to be extracted from Payne v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 9:04 am by Dennis Crouch
The transition from first-to-invent to first-to-file has involved a number of quirks, the latest is found in SNIPR Technologies Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 5:00 am by Randall Peterson
  Rather than seek permission from the Securities and Exchange Commission to exclude the proposal, the usual approach, the company instead filed suit (Apache v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 9:46 pm
Weideman As anticipated, a petition for review before the California Supreme Court was filed last week in Brinkley v. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 9:09 am
The definitions of "possession" and "antique" were central in the case of Wright v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 12:27 pm by Lyle Denniston
  That decision is in conflict with numerous other circuit court decisions and the highest court of a state decided both before and after Bush v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 1:58 pm
On Friday the SG's office filed this brief recommending that the Court deny cert. in No. 06-457, Rowe v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 7:02 am
Rhine filed a motion to quash, alleging that the delegation of authority to the TCEQ by the Legislature in the Health and Safety Code violated Article II, Section 1 of the Texas Constitution. [read post]