Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 4061 - 4080 of 9,114
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2017, 5:30 am by Kevin
Technically, the district court was the first one to use it—though only once. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:46 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
In the action against Impressions, the district court entered a stipulated judgment, holding that Lexmark’s patent rights in cartridges first sold in the United States were exhausted, but the rights were retained for cartridges first sold abroad. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:46 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
In the action against Impressions, the district court entered a stipulated judgment, holding that Lexmark’s patent rights in cartridges first sold in the United States were exhausted, but the rights were retained for cartridges first sold abroad. [read post]
30 May 2017, 10:34 am by John Floyd
This was evidenced in a May 24, 2017 decision, United States v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 9:53 am by Florian Mueller
"On that basis, the Supreme Court basically held that Lexmark couldn't impose the restrictions it relied upon in this litigation, and that this wouldn't work for Lexmark even if the first sale occurred outside the United States (the one scenario of the two in which the district court sided with Lexmark). [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:15 am by Peter Margulies
Trump upholding a Maryland district court’s  preliminary injunction against President Trump’s revised Refugee EO. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:12 am by Jordan Brunner, Amira Mikhail
Garfinkel, the court states it is forced to examine the plaintiff’s constitutional claim because this is largely the basis for the district court’s injunction. [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:58 am by John Floyd
  The Police Frameup of Clyde Raymond Spencer   On May 18, 2017, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals painted a portrait of this corrupt police practice in the case of Spencer v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 9:06 am by Beth Graham
The appellate court first ruled “the district court did not err by deciding the litigation-conduct waiver. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:15 pm
The district court’s opinion relied heavily on the Supreme Court’s decision in a previous ACLU lawsuit, Clapper v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:49 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court held today (quite correctly, I think, given the Maine constitution’s text): The Senate seeks our opinions regarding the constitutionality of a statute recently enacted through citizen initiative, which established ranked-choice voting for elections of United States Senators, United States Representatives, Governor, State Senators, State Representatives, and federal and state primaries in… [read post]
23 May 2017, 10:08 am by Andrew Brasher
The post Symposium: A recipe for continued confusion and more judicial involvement in redistricting appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
23 May 2017, 4:32 am by Guest Blogger
But the first step in reforming the law must be to reform the sense of judicial duty with which the courts approach their task. [read post]