Search for: "State v. Governor"
Results 4061 - 4080
of 7,106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2021, 9:05 pm
Shelby County v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:02 pm
(In Hiett v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 8:47 am
Much about Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 8:18 am
That’s why, in Utah v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 11:23 am
American Civil Liberties Union Kansas v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 1:45 pm
”Bob” DeSousa, State Director for U.S. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
R (Robinson) v The Governor of HMP Whatton & Anor(and related cases, heard 19-21 May 2014. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am
” This is despite China’s National Intelligence Law which requires citizens to cooperate and assist with state intelligence work. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 12:50 pm
Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber signed legislation that will allow the state to move forward with plans to overhaul its Medicaid Program. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 12:18 pm
On Friday, I wrote about an amicus brief, for me and 54 other antitrust and competition policy scholars, that I wrote in Teladoc v. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 3:51 pm
McCarthy v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
A little over a week ago, former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee commented on the idea of the government compelling people to limit the size of their Thanksgiving feasts. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:45 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
23 Aug 2014, 11:46 pm
Ferguson himself: Ferguson v. [read post]
18 Nov 2017, 11:47 am
Bi Xia Qu v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:41 am
With its 7-2 decision in Brown v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:44 am
R (Robinson) v The Governor of HMP Whatton & Anorand related cases, heard 19-21 May 2014. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:58 am
R (Robinson) v The Governor of HMP Whatton & Anorand related cases, heard 19-21 May 2014. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
The Sad State of Indigent Defense 50 Years after Gideon v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the plaintiffs had standing, reasoning that the lieutenant governor’s actions, if indeed violative of Article V, completely and improperly nullified the valid votes of the elected state legislators. [read post]
