Search for: "State v. Greene" Results 4061 - 4080 of 6,664
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2012, 1:18 am by Sam Murrant
MM and AO (A Child), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 668 The Secretary of State acted lawfully in not ordering an independent inquiry into the 2009 protest at the Immigration Detention Centre. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:17 pm
First, today's decision should put to rest the notion that the Obama administration is somehow rigging the proceedings to result in very low tariffs on Chinese imports in order to encourage the proliferation and use of "green energy" in the United States. [read post]
17 May 2012, 12:05 pm by Bexis
Green, 263 Ga. 470 (1993); Welch v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:00 am by Adam Gillette
   Unmentioned in the observation is the ironic point that the First Amendment protection against abstract advocacy of violence comes from Brandenburg v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 4:59 am by Russ Bensing
As the 8th District’s decision a couple weeks ago in State v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 12:08 pm by Arthur J. Fried
PRWORA Many people think that one must be a lawful permanent resident of the United States (i.e., have a “green card”) or be a refugee to be eligible for Medicaid. [read post]
15 May 2012, 5:58 am by Ken Kersch
The GGW “casebook” accordingly integrates the most important Supreme Court opinions with important state court decisions, public criticisms of U.S. and state Supreme Court decisions, and constitutional debates (taking place in varied venues) about territorial acquisition, the constitutionality of a national bank (Alexander Hamilton v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
The Justice and Security Bill, following a green paper, will allow (a limited use) of closed proceedings in national security proceedings [MoJ release - PDF] which has raised widespread concern. [read post]
11 May 2012, 5:49 pm by INFORRM
Australia’s High Court famously left the door open for a possible privacy tort in the ABC v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:44 pm by Steve Honig
  In the last Bush Administration, the President’s legal office stated that the Federal government could share enforcement of Federal policy with the States, and that the States therefore could have concurrent authority. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:02 pm by Suzanne Ito
This decision gives the commission the green light to consider whether the United States violated international human rights law — specifically its obligations under the American Declaration on the Rights and Duties of Man — by sentencing children to life without parole. [read post]
11 May 2012, 9:42 am by Roy Ginsburg
• Second, the employer may develop a “targeted screen” based on three factors articulated in a 1975 Eighth Circuit decision, Green v. [read post]