Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 4061 - 4080
of 8,247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
The copyright holders of the works sued for copyright infringement, naming the critic who uploaded the works, the operator of the BBS where the works were uploaded, and Netcom, which provided internet access to the BBS (and, by extension, to the critic). [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 7:42 pm
Microsoft Corporation v. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 11:52 pm
Samsung case in California), slide-to-unlock (at issue in the ongoing Apple v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:01 am
Es por eso que en Eldred v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 1:42 am
But patent trolls and app developers don't mix.The highest-profile patent dispute in the world, Apple v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 7:38 am
Holder, striking down a key portion of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 5:01 am
The CJEU has had to analyse blocking orders in the case of UPC Telekabel v Constantin Film & Wega Filmproduktionsgesellschaft (C‑314/12). [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 5:51 pm
Attorney General Eric Holder, however, has stated that the Michigan marriages would be recognized and all relevant federal benefits would be extended. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:38 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 6:01 pm
United States. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:48 pm
Finally, I want to end with Nimmer’s prediction about the prospect of a new copyright act in the United States. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 6:55 am
She followed up with statements from Attorney General Eric Holder and Acting Assistant AG for National Security John Carlin. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 2:22 pm
Gilman has filed a motion to intervene, stating that `because [he] is the privilege holder, his interests are not adequately represented by the other parties in this matter. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 1:21 pm
The complaint (full text) in Messer v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 10:56 am
Holders of medical marijuana cards are not subject to the trace law. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 10:25 am
The statement is in accordance with Holder's initial statement [text] that the Department of Justice (DOJ) will be extending all federal benefits to same-sex couples legally married according to state law following the decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 9:53 am
RETRIEVER SVERIGE In the high profile case of Case-466/12 Svensson & Others v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:50 am
But what if there is a lien holder and the lien holder is not notified of the policy cancellation. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
The development of this business model has troubled the Courts in the United States and the United Kingdom. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:08 am
In United States v. [read post]