Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 4061 - 4080
of 19,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2020, 3:59 am
Mark Sherman reports for AP that the coalition of states “asked the Supreme Court for a fast-track review of a recent court ruling that declared part of the statute unconstitutional and cast a cloud over the rest. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 5:19 am
Yet, in the United States today, our criminal-justice system has it exactly backwards, relying on what Mark Kleiman and Kelsey Hollander justifiably call ”a system of randomly Draconian punishments. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:22 am
However, Bishop v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 12:18 am
It stated that the ASA only hears matters relating to “published advertising” (in relation to the definition of ‘advertising’ in the ASA Code). [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 4:02 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 5:33 am
Mark the name United States v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 10:33 am
Since 1977, the Supreme Court has followed the approach dictated in Marks v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 3:42 am
United States v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 9:52 am
As trivial as these questions might appear, the answer can make or break your trade mark protection, as the recent General Court judgment in Wenz Kunststoff v EUIPO - Mouldpro (MOULDPRO) (case T-794/21) shows: Background On 6 June 2011, Wenz Kunststoff GmbH & Co. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:45 pm
For example, in Kraft Foods Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 3:26 am
The UK Supreme Court answered this question in the affirmative earlier this week in its judgment in R v M & Ors [2017] UKSC 58.Issued in the context of an interlocutory appeal in criminal proceedings, this ruling concerned the proper construction of section 92(1) of the UK Trade Marks Act 1994. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 1:56 am
KG v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 3:08 am
Next, the Board applied the four-part test articulated in University of Notre Dame du Lac v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:23 pm
In Savva Terentyev v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:40 pm
S. 446, 452 (2019) (internal quotation marks omitted); see Dutra Group v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 4:52 am
State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 9:27 pm
If the writers wish their comments to be given serious consideration, they are invited to amend their posts so as to state who they are. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the ninth cause of action, alleging aiding and abetting discrimination (see Strauss v New York State Dept. of Educ., 26 AD3d 67, 73). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the ninth cause of action, alleging aiding and abetting discrimination (see Strauss v New York State Dept. of Educ., 26 AD3d 67, 73). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the ninth cause of action, alleging aiding and abetting discrimination (see Strauss v New York State Dept. of Educ., 26 AD3d 67, 73). [read post]
