Search for: "State v. Seven" Results 4061 - 4080 of 11,115
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2009, 11:58 am
What's true for four-day, 10-hour workweeks is probably similarly true for, as in this case, 12-hour "seven days on every two weeks" structures. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 2:14 pm by Mitchell Jagodinski
United States, Erick Osby was indicted on seven charges; the jury convicted him of two and acquitted him of the other five. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 6:54 pm
District Judge Donald Molloy last week found constitutional problems with provisions of the Adam Walsh Act in US v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:30 am
He was one of the lead lawyers in the landmark Supreme Court ruling in Romer v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 5:28 am by INFORRM
The article had erroneously stated that an injunction had been made by the court which was “so strict that it prevents Sir Fred Goodwin being identified as a banker”. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:55 am by Kevin Johnson
Six of the seven remaining states deem it not sufficiently serious to be treated as ‘sexual abuse. [read post]
13 May 2022, 8:13 am by Edward T. Kang and Ryan T. Kirk
District Judge Stephanie Haines of the Western District of Pennsylvania recently discussed its application at length in Seven Springs Mountain Resort v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 4:00 am
Not later than ten days after receipt of the hearing officer's decision [emphasis supplied], the employee or the employing board may make an application to the New York state supreme court to vacate or modify the decision of the hearing officer pursuant to section seven thousand five hundred eleven of the civil practice law and rules. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 10:03 am by Lyle Denniston
   The Supreme Court, in McConnell v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 6:45 am by bryannewland
Our tribes retained the right to fish in the ceded waters under that treaty; a fact that was confirmed in the landmark case of United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 6:31 pm by Joy Waltemath
And, although it was unsettled whether the state high court would recognize the defendants’ parent-subsidiary estoppel approach, the appeals court predicted that the state high court would not likely embrace the theory, which has no footing in Utah law. [read post]