Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 4061 - 4080
of 14,843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2008, 11:26 am
Hayes v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:43 am
(See Wlotkowski v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 11:57 am
In this case, the Plaintiff did not produce a very strong record of use in commerce. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 11:57 am
In this case, the Plaintiff did not produce a very strong record of use in commerce. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 11:57 am
In this case, the Plaintiff did not produce a very strong record of use in commerce. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 8:25 am
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 8:27 am
 Check the Kucana v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 8:15 am
In Carolina Conduit Systems Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 9:30 am
That 1872 ruling, in the case of United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 11:16 am
In City of Livonia Employee Retirement System v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:01 am
In that context, objections can be raised that might not find strong ground if the proposal to expand nexus is viewed as an expansion of the taxing power. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
Something which is a charge for credit cannot be part of the credit: But for the provisions of section 9 of the Act, there would be a strong case for saying that, since the total amount advanced was £18,350, that was the amount of credit and, since that sum was not stated in the agreement to be the amount of the credit, it follows that it does not contain a prescribed term and is unenforceable. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
Something which is a charge for credit cannot be part of the credit: But for the provisions of section 9 of the Act, there would be a strong case for saying that, since the total amount advanced was £18,350, that was the amount of credit and, since that sum was not stated in the agreement to be the amount of the credit, it follows that it does not contain a prescribed term and is unenforceable. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 12:00 am
In Ledore Investments Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 3:18 pm
Brief of Washington Legal Foundation, as Aimcus Curiae Supporting Appellant, United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:04 am
Further, the competing public interest in the need to avoid the corruption of the administration of justice by the court being misled was a strong one, particularly where, as in this case, new evidence which had not been previously available had come to light. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 10:00 am
In Munchkin, Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 5:01 am
From Chief Judge Beryl Howell's opinion in Doe v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 9:37 am
Ricci v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 10:05 am
Supreme Court heard oral arguments yesterday in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
