Search for: "TIME WARNER"
Results 4061 - 4080
of 4,493
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2024, 9:05 pm
Although not legislation, the report marked the first time that lawmakers have taken such an in-depth look at who is, and is not, benefitting from streaming. [read post]
7 May 2020, 11:12 am
Mar. 25, 2013). [4] Id. [5] Warner Brothers Pictures Inc., 197 Cal.App.2d 331. [6] See, e.g., Jegen v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 10:04 pm
Time Warner Entertainment Co., 331 F.3d 13, 18 (2d Cir.2003); Moore v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 8:20 pm
It was a good long time ago, but so engaged was I with the marketing of legal services that I even served for a time on the Board of Directors of what was then—this was in the early 1990s—the National Law Firm Marketing Association [NALFMA], which has since become the Legal Marketing Association [LMA], whose just-ended annual meeting is one of the triggers of this post. [read post]
15 May 2009, 1:03 am
On Wednesday, a Boston federal judge denied class certification for a second time. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 7:45 am
Supreme Court could keep the case in the news for some time to come. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 1:35 am
A broad coalition including AT&T, Verizon, Cablevision, Comcast and Time-Warner, major and independent record companies, movie studios, independent film makers and television producers have agreed to work together to bring professionalism and sanity to the Internet ecosystem. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am
(Spicy IP) Patent grant dates and serial oppositions: A timely clarification (Spicy IP) Netherlands Court of Appeal The Hague finds invalidity for lack of inventive step: Clyde Bergemann v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 8:51 am
The last thing we wanted was for the DC Circuit to avoid the key question of the test case on appeal--does the FCC have jurisdiction to protect consumers, preserve an open Internet, encourage deployment of new technologies.We were given the guidance we wanted, although the answer we didn't.The Obama FCC had thought, until yesterday, that under the Bush-FCC's framework, the FCC maintained something lawyers call "Title I," or "ancillary jurisdiction" over Internet access… [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 7:00 am
Since 2005, Signature has been committed to presenting its world-class programming at an affordable price: the Signature Ticket Initiative, with major support form Time Warner, offers subsidized $20 tickets to all performances. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:00 am
This process can be time-consuming, complicated, and overwhelming, especially if you are not familiar with tax laws and regulations. [read post]
3 May 2010, 8:46 am
Here are a few random examples of corporate Company Profiles: Warner Brothers, British Airways and Research in Motion. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 7:51 am
It is important to remember that copyright owner audits of the MLC will be the first time an independent third party has had a look at the accounting systems and functional technology of The MLC. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 3:35 am
Siembida suggested using email for communications with the undercover agent. . . .At trial, the government offered a stipulation among the parties that, if called, Hans Nielsen, a `Senior Messaging Engineer' for Time Warner Cable who was employed by Adelphia from 2003 to early 2006, would testify that he was familiar with the Adelphia email system utilized by Siembida. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Everyone can’t be happy all the time. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 8:01 am
Even with the BTN agreement as a template, lawyers on both sides will be expected to spend extra time to expressly assert detailed constructions of performance and remedies within the contract. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:09 am
- Paragraph (2)(B) contains no time limit on when the particular conviction occurred. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 2:57 pm
In 1996 he filed a whistleblower claim against Warner Lambert (which Pfizer acquired in 2000) for its aggressive off-label marketing of Neurontin. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:09 am
Times (Oct. 3, 2019). [20] United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 11:18 am
They can take down anything they want at any time for any reason, copyright being just one of many potential avenues. [read post]
