Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor"
Results 4061 - 4080
of 4,755
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2009, 6:36 am
Linda Taylor, Defendant-Appellant.2009 WL 588020(N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 5:29 pm
Sheppard Mullin represented the prevailing appellants, BIACC and Taylor Morrison Homes. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 12:00 am
Lusignan, The Clause Less Taken: Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 11:40 am
Taylor, 2009 U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 5:29 am
Lawyer-blogger Hans Bader has published this analysis of news coverage of the Ledbetter v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 4:20 am
"Typically such termination is "by operation of law" and all that is required is the appointing authority determination that Section 30.1(e) applies with respect to the individual involved.In Bowman v Kerik, 271 A.D.2d 225, the court said that Section 30.1(e) of the Public Officers Law provides that a public office becomes vacant upon the conviction of the incumbent "of a felony, or a crime involving a violation of his oath of office. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 3:59 am
(My thanks to IntLawGrrls for inviting me to contibute this guest post.)On Wednesday, the Special Court for Sierra Leone's Trial Chamber I issued its judgment in what is referred to as the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) case - Prosecutor v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 3:59 am
(My thanks to IntLawGrrls for inviting me to contibute this guest post.)On Wednesday, the Special Court for Sierra Leone's Trial Chamber I issued its judgment in what is referred to as the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) case - Prosecutor v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 1:52 pm
The opinion is Middleton, et al v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 12:32 am
Taylor v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 10:41 am
Oral Argument in case: 07-4013; USA v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 3:55 am
Taylor, 2009 U.S. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
Taylor, 2009 Ill. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 5:26 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 6:30 am
Judge Taylor then ruled prior incidents as were "substantially similar" may be admissible in evidence on "notice". [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 8:22 am
In a series of cases beginning with Williams v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
Taylor v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 1:02 pm
Today the Tax Court decided Taylor v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 9:11 am
I guess we'll see.]Pamela Shareka Langham v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
