Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 4061 - 4080 of 8,957
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2015, 9:05 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state and administrative courts in North Carolina, before the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, and before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 4:36 am by SHG
United States has an issue that could do some serious harm to nice folks who meet the criminal justice system. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am by John Elwood
United States, 15-5238, out of the way. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 2:41 am by Amy Howe
” Deputy Solicitor General Michael Dreeben, arguing on behalf of the United States, emphasized that the same principle animating the Court’s decision allowing restraints on tainted assets before trial applies equally to untainted ones:  if the government can get the money at the end of the day, he told the Court, it needs to be sure that the money will be available. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:48 pm by Robert Loeb
As expected, today, November 10, 2015, Midland Funding filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court, asking the Court to review the Second Circuit’s ruling in Madden v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 11:31 am by Courtney Hostetler
The prohibition against general warrants is rooted in United States history. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 6:59 am by Hanibal Goitom
Currently, according to the United States Department of Agriculture, India is the world’s biggest exporter of beef. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 6:54 am by Robert Loeb, David Ryan
[T]here is no clear indication of extraterritoriality here . . . and petitioners' case seeking relief for violations of the law of nations occurring outside the United States is barred. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 8:39 am
The petitioner argues that, because a complete breakdown in the adversarial process occurred, his claim instead is controlled by United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 1:49 pm by Marty Lederman
  Such a plan discontinuance is something the law would permit Catholic Charities to do; it’s something that many employers across the United States are likely to do; and presumably it would not be prohibited by Catholic Charities’ (or the Diocese’s) religion. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-10154, was the lone grant among the relists. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 3:38 am
While the mark may have achieved some level of fame for Section 2(d) purposes, it was not shown that the mark is "widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States as a designation of source," the standard stated in the dilution statute. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 8:24 am by Steve Vladeck
United States was, as Evan Lee put it, “The Battle of the Canons,” the first argument in Torres v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 9:11 am by WIMS
Each of the two petitioners now before us, Treasure State Resource Industry Association and United States Steel Corporation, challenges one of these 29 designations (not meeting its new SO2 standards): the Association attacks the one for part of Yellowstone County, Montana, and U.S. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 9:08 pm by Stephen Bilkis
At the time the first allegation of mistreatment was received in January 1977, plaintiffs' parents were receiving counseling under the auspices of Manhattan Family Court, where they were monitored by the Home Advisory Unit and received court [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:23 pm by Amy Howe
So when Breyer recounted errors in Robins’s credit report and asked Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart (arguing on behalf of the United States in support of Robins) whether, for purposes of deciding this case, Spokeo’s errors would constitute a sufficiently concrete injury to Robins, the Chief Justice quickly countered that “that’s not what the” court of appeals said. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 10:34 am
 At least if that Nevada conviction took place in 2009 (as petitioner's did); as of 2013, even in Nevada, such a conviction wouldn't subject you to removal (since the maximum penalty is now 364 days).But since it was in Nevada, and since it was 2009, petitioner gets deported even though he's been in the United States for nearly two decades, and even if he can show, e.g., exceptional hardship to U.S. citizens as a result of his removal. [read post]