Search for: "VI" Results 4061 - 4080 of 13,322
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2013, 7:44 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This is a new holding for the Second Circuit.Third, Title VII damages awards are not applicable to student harassment cases under Title VI and Title IX. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 9:54 am
Shakespeare's famous "kill all the lawyers" line was uttered by Dick the Butcher in ''Henry VI,'' Part II, act IV, Scene II, Line 73. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 7:49 am
The Board therefore found the marks to be famous under Section 43(c)(2)(A).Turning to the six non-exhaustive factors of Section 43(c)(B)(i)-(vi) for assessing the likelihood of dilution by blurring, Applicant’s witness stated that the building depicted in applicant’s mark is the Empire State Building, and there was no evidence to indicate otherwise. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Ultimately the designated disciplinary hearing officer found Petitioner guilty of specifications 5 and 6, as well as a portion of specification 4, of charge I; specifications 3, 4, and 5 of charge II; specification 4 of Supplemental Charge II; specification 4 of Supplemental Charge III; specification 4 of Supplemental Charge IV; specifications 4 and 5 of Supplemental Charge V; specification 4 of Supplemental Charge VI; and specification 4, as well as a portion of specification 6, of… [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 7:40 am
And Shakespeare had it both ways:1599 Shakespeare Romeo & Juliet ii. v. 12 The sweetest honey Is loathsome in its owne deliciousnesse.a1616 Shakespeare Henry VI, Pt. 2 (1623) iii. ii. 396 The Cradle-babe, Dying with mothers dugge betweene it's lips. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Ultimately the designated disciplinary hearing officer found Petitioner guilty of specifications 5 and 6, as well as a portion of specification 4, of charge I; specifications 3, 4, and 5 of charge II; specification 4 of Supplemental Charge II; specification 4 of Supplemental Charge III; specification 4 of Supplemental Charge IV; specifications 4 and 5 of Supplemental Charge V; specification 4 of Supplemental Charge VI; and specification 4, as well as a portion of specification 6, of… [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 6:21 am
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+VI&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=8675000&SeqEnd=12200000Read More [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 7:25 pm
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+VI&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=8350000&SeqEnd=10200000 https://www.verywellfamily.com/psychological-effects-of-divorce-on-kids-4140170#divorce-may-increase-behavior-problemsRead More [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Ultimately the designated disciplinary hearing officer found Petitioner guilty of specifications 5 and 6, as well as a portion of specification 4, of charge I; specifications 3, 4, and 5 of charge II; specification 4 of Supplemental Charge II; specification 4 of Supplemental Charge III; specification 4 of Supplemental Charge IV; specifications 4 and 5 of Supplemental Charge V; specification 4 of Supplemental Charge VI; and specification 4, as well as a portion of specification 6, of… [read post]
10 May 2022, 2:09 pm
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+VI&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=8675000&SeqEnd=12200000 Read More [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 6:45 am
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+VI&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=8675000&SeqEnd=12200000Read More [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 11:48 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - Indiana patent attorneys for Knauf Insulation, LLC of Shelbyville, Indiana; Knauf Insulation GmbH of Iphofen, Germany; and Knauf Insulation SPRL of Visé, Belgium filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Johns Manville Corporation and Johns Manville, Inc., both of Denver, Colorado, infringed Patent Nos. 8,114,210 and 8,940,089, both for "Binders," and D631,670 for "Insulation Material. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 11:56 am
+VI&ActID=1815&ChapterID=49&SeqStart=122400000&SeqEnd=123900000Read More [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 2:01 pm
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+VI&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=8675000&SeqEnd=12200000Read More [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 11:20 am
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+VI&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=8300000&SeqEnd=10000000  Read More [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 10:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
The life and times of patent no. 2,670: industrial property and public knowledge in early twentieth-century Japan · Kjell EricsonPart VI. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 11:01 am by oliver randl
It stated that “[T]he representative never withdrew previous ARs I to VI (sic) at this point (or at any other point) in the OPs. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Ultimately the designated disciplinary hearing officer found Petitioner guilty of specifications 5 and 6, as well as a portion of specification 4, of charge I; specifications 3, 4, and 5 of charge II; specification 4 of Supplemental Charge II; specification 4 of Supplemental Charge III; specification 4 of Supplemental Charge IV; specifications 4 and 5 of Supplemental Charge V; specification 4 of Supplemental Charge VI; and specification 4, as well as a portion of specification 6, of… [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 10:19 am
Trademark attorneys for WWP assert the following in their complaint against Graham and HIVI: • Count I: False Advertising - Lanham Act • Count II: Criminal Deception - Indiana Crime Victims Act• Count III: Defamation - Indiana Common Law• Count IV: Unfair Competition - Indiana Common Law• Count V: Tortious Interference with Business Relationships - Indiana Common Law• Count VI: Unjust Enrichment - Indiana Common Law WWP asks the court for a permanent… [read post]