Search for: "Weeks v. United States"
Results 4061 - 4080
of 19,154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2023, 2:26 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 11:15 am
This week in Other Barks & Bites: Modified Opinion issued in Facebook v. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 5:01 pm
‘Steep hill to climb’ In a landmark First Amendment case almost 60 years ago, New York Times v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
Caceres-Olla, Ninth Circuit: After pleading guilty to unlawful reentry into the United States, Appellant was sentenced to 46 months in prison. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 4:53 am
And even the Ninth Circuit’s anticipated decision may not finally resolve the matter, as the issue could ultimately reach the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 6:13 am
., Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 11:28 am
The United States Supreme Court unanimously held in Thompson v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm
Today we continue our weekly installment highlighting the best of the patent blogosphere from the past week. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 8:04 am
"Mexico protests U.S. ruling on death row case," is the Reuters headline in fallout from last week's Supreme Court ruling in Medellin v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
As I have noted, Republicans in North Carolina (and Pennsylvania too) have been invoking the theory over the last few weeks to challenge state court rulings that rejected (and replaced) congressional district lines drawn by the state legislatures. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 3:52 pm
Nonetheless, the Supreme Court has already ruled that at least some asset forfeitures are covered by the Clause in the 1998 case of United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:56 am
” United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:56 am
” United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 2:22 pm
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2022.html United States of America v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
The Supreme Court decided this week the case of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
After its February 2008 decision in Riegel v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 2:30 pm
District Court for the District of ColumbiaCourtroom 18, 6th Floor333 Constitution Avenue N.W.Washington D.C. 20001For more on this case:https://www.eff.org/cases/woodhull-freedom-foundation-et-al-v-united-statesFor the motion for preliminary injunction:https://www.eff.org/document/woodhull-freedom-foundation-et-al-v-united-states-motion-preliminary-injunction-and Contact: DavidGreeneCivil Liberties Directordavidg@eff.org … [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 12:45 pm
Both individuals were able to enter the United States as a result. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 3:59 pm
This Week, United States Supreme Court Rules DNA Tests Can Be Done On Innocent People Arrested – and Stored in National DNA Database On Monday, the United States Supreme Court released its opinion in the case of Maryland v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am
” In a brief per curiam decision, the justices also dismissed United States v. [read post]
