Search for: "A R C C A Inc" Results 4081 - 4100 of 8,833
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2014, 12:05 pm by Guest Author for TradeSecretsLaw.com
 General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc., 637 F.3d 1047 (9th Cir. 2011), the employee removed vast amounts of confidential information from the company, including attorney-client privileged communications, trade secrets, internal research and development information, sensitive government information and documents under a secrecy order. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:08 am by Joy Waltemath
As such, the appeals court affirmed the dismissal of his claim against the union as untimely (Kalyanaram v American Association of University Professors at the New York Institute of Technology, Inc, February 3, 2014, Droney, C). [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
Fugua Industries, Inc. 541 F.2d 584 (6th Cir. 1976); Normandy Place Assoc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 9:04 am by Doug Cornelius
Céline Gearson, Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer at Cameron International, had an interesting perspective on how she internally markets her compliance function. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 3:35 am by Peter Mahler
(LBCC) formed in 1999 as part of a reorganization and split-up of a predecessor C corporation. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 3:33 am
Logan's Roadhouse, Inc., the court was faced with the question of whether Rule 9(c) permits a lesser pleading standard than Rule 8, permitting plaintiffs in such cases to avoid the plausibility requirement. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 10:01 pm by Cathy Siegner
Robert Scheir, a medical microbiologist and president of Cerritos, CA-based Steril-Aire, Inc. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 7:27 am by Joy Waltemath
Vacating the lower court’s decision, the appeals court found that neither Sec. 2000e-2(c), which forbids discrimination by any labor organization, nor Sec. 2000e-3(a), which forbids retaliation against a person who has asserted rights under Title VII or supported another person’s assertions of rights, “makes anything turn on the existence of a statutory or contractual duty violated by the act said to be discriminatory. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
In many jurisdictions, corporate officials sued for their actions undertaken in their corporate capacity may be able to defend themselves in reliance on the “business judgment rule. [read post]