Search for: "Application of Smith"
Results 4081 - 4100
of 7,620
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2014, 4:02 am
But, despite the risk that the applicant's business would close if the termination went ahead, an injunction to prevent the termination of the licensing agreement (applied for under the Arbitration Act 1996 s.44) was refused by Mr Justice Stuart-Smith. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 12:59 am
The Applicant was the buyers’ bank. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 2:34 pm
In two recent posts, I argued the following about the upcoming Hobby Lobby case, which will be argued on Tuesday morning, March 25th:(i) that, contrary to the assumptions of the plaintiffs and many federal courts, there is in fact no legal duty for the owners of Hobby Lobby and other employers to do anything their religion allegedly forbids--namely, offer the company's employees a health-insurance plan that includes contraception coverage, since there is no legal duty to offer an employee plan in… [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 1:47 pm
Pursuant to the Fee Setting Authority granted to the USPTO by the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, certain fee changes were implemented on January 1, 2014. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 1:47 pm
Pursuant to the Fee Setting Authority granted to the USPTO by the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, certain fee changes were implemented on January 1, 2014. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 10:03 am
After disclosing the conviction and sex offender status on his applications, Chase Law School at Northern Kentucky University and Brandeis Law School at the University of Louisville both rejected him in 2008. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 9:34 am
Smith (1870) 17 Gr. 660 (Ont. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 5:30 pm
– Minneapolis lawyer Steve Baird of Winthrop & Weinstine on the firm’s Duets Blog A Not-So Happy New Year for California Employers: 2014 Legislative Update – Sacramento lawyer Tony DeCristoforo on the Stoel Rives World of Employment Sexual Assault Cases on Campus – The Rise of Claims from the Accused – Syracuse lawyer John Gaal of Bond Schoeneck & King on the firm’s Higher Education Law Report Don’t Assume An Applicant Is Not Qualified… [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 4:33 am
Smith & Nephew argued for much earlier dates. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 5:25 am
Happy New Year from all of us here at DDLaw! [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm
The claim was on the basis ofan implied obligation to keep the retained parts in repair or alternatively a common law duty as adjoining occupier to remedy any defect in those premises which was capable of causing damage to the demised premises.At trial of the damages counterclaim, Judge Cowell accepted that there was an implied duty on CHA to remedy any defects in the retained parts that would cause damage to the demised properties.He based this on the decision in Hargroves, Aronson & Co v… [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm
The claim was on the basis ofan implied obligation to keep the retained parts in repair or alternatively a common law duty as adjoining occupier to remedy any defect in those premises which was capable of causing damage to the demised premises.At trial of the damages counterclaim, Judge Cowell accepted that there was an implied duty on CHA to remedy any defects in the retained parts that would cause damage to the demised properties.He based this on the decision in Hargroves, Aronson & Co v… [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 8:44 am
Moreover, while everyone has a point of view on what kinds of cases provoke the greatest sympathy, we have learned in our many years on Reed Smith’s Pro Bono Committee that disabled veterans garner the broadest imaginable support. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
In other words, the courts have basically been concluding that all of these new forms of digital technology should be evaluated under the same long-standing rules applicable to more conventional forms of paper discovery and evidence. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
In other words, the courts have basically been concluding that all of these new forms of digital technology should be evaluated under the same long-standing rules applicable to more conventional forms of paper discovery and evidence. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 8:51 am
The following article was written by Craig Smith, one of my partners at Smith Hartvigsen, PLLC, for the Water & The Law newsletter that our firm publishes on a quarterly basis. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 10:54 am
The best that can be said about Smith v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:43 pm
Smith, 87 N.Y.2d 715, 721, quoting People v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 8:29 am
Two other courts have addressed this specific issue of a liability waiver in the past - Smith v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:52 am
Attorney Aaron Smith for their work on the case. [read post]
