Search for: "Body v. Body" Results 4081 - 4100 of 21,346
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm by Rachel Bercovitz, Todd Carney
The chief justice situates his analysis within a body of case law regarding Congress’s subpoena powers. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 7:39 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
”  While the Bureau may be correct in its assessment, it could nevertheless face questions regarding the impact of Seila Law on settled or otherwise resolved enforcement matters, particularly given the limited body of case law dealing with ratification and related doctrines such as de facto officer and de facto validity. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
Does it make sense that lawyers elected by lawyers should effectively decide the permitted scope of practice of paralegals with whom they do or would compete for work? [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 4:15 pm by Ronald Mann
The first thing we learned this morning with the announcement of the decision in McGirt v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 5:21 am by Florence Campbell Jones
The recent case of Barclays Bank Plc v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 13 clarified the English law position that a principal cannot be vicariously liable for the acts of an independent contractor. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 1:22 am by Jani Ihalainen
 Furthermore, the Commissioner considered the decision in the University of Utah v Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, where the US Federal Court determined that 'inventors' of patents are the individuals that conceived the invention, which seems to, again, not include non-human inventors. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 1:22 am by Jani Ihalainen
 Furthermore, the Commissioner considered the decision in the University of Utah v Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, where the US Federal Court determined that 'inventors' of patents are the individuals that conceived the invention, which seems to, again, not include non-human inventors. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 1:22 am by Jani Ihalainen
 Furthermore, the Commissioner considered the decision in the University of Utah v Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, where the US Federal Court determined that 'inventors' of patents are the individuals that conceived the invention, which seems to, again, not include non-human inventors. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 1:22 am by Jani Ihalainen
 Furthermore, the Commissioner considered the decision in the University of Utah v Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, where the US Federal Court determined that 'inventors' of patents are the individuals that conceived the invention, which seems to, again, not include non-human inventors. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 9:56 am
This amalgam, then, necessarily produces an orthodoxy--a means of fusing the bodies of the collective into a single form fo expression (within of course permitted idiosyncratic variation). [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
Supreme Court struck down a Louisiana law that required abortion providers to obtain admitting privileges at a hospital and affirmed the Court’s previous decision in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]