Search for: "COOPER v. STATE" Results 4081 - 4100 of 7,361
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
@The Appellate Division observed that the ICPC, codified in Social Services Law '374Ba, is a statutory agreement with the express purpose of fostering cooperation and communication between all 50 states so that children requiring placement in another state Ashall receive the maximum opportunity to be placed in a suitable environment and with persons or institutions having appropriate qualifications and facilities to provide a necessary and desirable degree and type of… [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:52 am by WIMS
<> Black Warrior Riverkeeper, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm by LindaMBeale
  NY State Division of Human Rights v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 9:20 pm by Series of Essays
Virginia State Board of Elections and Cooper v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive for… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case - Owen Dean's response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 - Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal Administrative Court finds PARK AVENUE not descriptive for… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
Sidemans and Company Nigeria Limited v Calag Capital Limited (Afro-IP) &nbsp; Poland Personal circumstances in trade mark registration (Class 46) &nbsp; South Africa FIFA v Metcash trade mark case &ndash; Owen Dean&rsquo;s response (Afro-IP) South Africa 1 &ndash; Ambush Marketers 0: legal framework to help FIFA and 2010 World Cup sponsors protect their rights (Managing IP) &nbsp; Switzerland New developments in Swiss patent law (IP Frontline) Federal… [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 5:44 am by Russell Knight
R. 219(c)(iv) The non-cooperative spouse will not be allowed to testify as to what he or she is not cooperating with. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 11:23 am by The Blog Team
The District Court, however, ruled that an earlier decision from the Fourth Circuit, United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 3:47 pm by Lara
Trademark Ownership Showdown Burning Man’s Burning Marks Trademark Attorney Ponders Parody — Yankees v Evil Enterprises [read post]