Search for: "California State Bar Court"
Results 4081 - 4100
of 11,181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2020, 5:08 am
Engaging in Political Activities—California, Colorado, Louisiana, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, South Carolina, West Virginia, Guam, Ann Arbor, Seattle, and Madison These states bar employers from retaliating against employees for engaging in political activities. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
And the Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 11:59 am
Rosette (Sovereign Immunity) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlMatter of Delaney (Attorney Discipline) U.S. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 8:43 am
I guess that's why the court referred the prosecutor to the state bar. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 12:55 pm
The United States Supreme Court ruled that driving under the influence was not a violent crime, so it was not an aggravated felony. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 9:01 am
Scott Dodson is a Professor of Law at University of California Hastings College of the Law. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 10:00 am
Giuliana Perrone, of the University of California at Berkeley, presented "Reconstructing Law After Emancipation: A Study of State Courts in the Post Civil War South. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:07 pm
In rebuttal, counsel for the defendant suggested that plaintiff had melded general and special jurisdiction in a way that the Supreme Court's Goodyear decision specifically barred. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 3:42 am
The Committee for the Rule of Law, established to oppose a California rule permitting courts to “depublish” opinions (an issue I had a run-in with in a federal district court), has a collection of law review articles challenging unpublished opinions. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:11 pm
Corey 13-1149 Issue: Whether California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard is unconstitutional because it discriminates against out-of-state fuels and regulates interstate and foreign commerce that occurs wholly outside of California. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 1:46 pm
Onyx sued the excess insurers in California state court seeking a judicial declaration that the excess insurers’ policies covered the $26 million portion of the settlement. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 11:05 am
” The government tries to argue in the Supreme Court that U.S. law would bar the disclosure of this information. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 6:00 am
As we rang in the new year, CBL committed to post some ideas about how to improve three problematic areas of California law, making them less business-unfriendly while maintaining California's position as a very pro-consumer, pro-green state. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 8:18 am
The petition said that Chen was injured in a fall during a trip to California, and lost contact with his case, but had no intention of abandoning it. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 1:59 pm
*Certified by The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 8:48 am
GOP bills in Congress would codify the Trump-era DOL guidance and/or deny the Biden Administration funding to implement its ESG policies.At the state level, California recently failed to enact additional climate disclosures for companies doing business in the state and its efforts to legislatively diversity corporate boards have been successfully challenged in court. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 9:49 am
The Supreme Court gave the government a partial victory, barring the challengers from deposing Ross but allowing the deposition of Gore and the additional fact-finding. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:56 am
" The Court of Appeals further stated that consideration of the following four factors, borrowed from a California case, are "helpful": (1) the degree of conflict in the evidence on critical issues; (2) whether respondent's argument to the jury may have contributed to the instruction's misleading effect; (3) whether the jury requested a rereading of the erroneous instruction or of related evidence; . . . and [4] the effect of other… [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 10:47 am
California, 332 U.S. 46, 68 (1947) (Murphy, J. dissenting). [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 6:41 pm
Relying on other state court cases, the Reynov court found that section 206.5 prohibited a release of wages due unless paid in full, and “wages are not due if there is a good faith dispute as to whether they are owed. [read post]
