Search for: "Case v. People" Results 4081 - 4100 of 52,001
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2011, 8:48 am by James Eckert
We don't see misuse of NYCTA MetroCard charges very often, but the Court of Appeals decided such a case today in People v Hightower (#223 decided December 23, 2011). [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 3:43 am by INFORRM
In the case of Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Pedavoli  ([2015] NSWCA 237) the NSW Court of Appeal has unanimously dismissed an appeal by Fairfax Media over the $350,000 damages awarded to a female schoolteacher it falsely accused of sexually preying on male students. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 7:25 am by Sarah Harrington
In the ensuing decades, the court has upheld restrictions on the president’s ability to remove executive officers in a handful of other cases, including 1958’s Wiener v. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 3:29 am by Earl Drott
People pursuing claims against employers for harm caused by an employee’s car accident must demonstrate that the employer’s negligence directly led to the crash in question, however, otherwise their claims may be dismissed, as demonstrated recently in Jesus Yanez v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 8:30 am by azatty
How the state addresses the needs of the seriously mentally ill was the subject of Arnold v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 6:26 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
S., at 49, is an insult to Congress and a disservice to the people of Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 3:59 pm by Michael Lowe
 This Week, United States Supreme Court Rules DNA Tests Can Be Done On Innocent People Arrested – and Stored in National DNA Database On Monday, the United States Supreme Court released its opinion in the case of Maryland v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 8:34 pm by cdw
The next will address system issues in the representation of poor people through the lens of two cases,  Simmons v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 11:53 am
Some people decry the "softening" of the United States. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 5:05 am
The number of people finding this blog by using the search string "Stack v Dowden" since I posted about the case a couple of days ago suggests to me a huge desire amongst family lawyers for some guidance upon resolving cohabitees' property disputes.When so many people choose to cohabit rather than marry, is it satisfactory that we should have to rely upon a succession of (sometimes contradictory) court decisions to enable us to advise our clients? [read post]