Search for: "Cooper v. United States"
Results 4081 - 4100
of 4,613
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2009, 2:12 pm
Opinion below(7th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Docket: 08-769 Title: United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 2:44 am
Not an "Integrity Unit," but still a good ideaSen. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 9:52 pm
United States v Hertular, April 7, 2009. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 3:40 pm
California Native Plant Society v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 9:33 am
The United States has had an uneven record in prosecuting internet pharmacy cases. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 5:36 pm
At the time of the merger, Whole Foods operated 194 stores in 37 states, the District of Columbia and the United Kingdom. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 9:50 am
Hypo 2: United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:26 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 6:34 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: New Zealand Prime Minister announces s 92A ‘three strikes’ copyright provision will be scrapped (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Public Knowledge) (Excess Copyright) (IPKat) US: TomTom files countersuit against Microsoft claiming its Streets… [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 5:32 am
The procedure was used in the case of United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 7:27 pm
Hirsh, Marco V. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 12:20 pm
In United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:50 am
It states that Congress found the following: (i) the Treasury Secretary does not have authority to provide exemptions or special rules to particular industries or classes of taxpayers; (ii) the Notice granting 382 relief is inconsistent with Congressional intent and the legal authority of this Notice is doubtful; but (iii) taxpayers should be allowed to rely on the Notice. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 3:39 pm
The case of United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 5:40 am
Louis, IS & M Ry Co v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
(Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC: Independent consultant held jointly liable for infringement: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (PatLit) Can THE JOURNAL ever be distinctive for a journal? [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 5:22 pm
--An eligible person described in this subsection is-- (1) an individual who is-- (A) a citizen or legal resident of the United States; or (B) a member of a group that includes citizens or legal residents of the United States; or (2) an entity that is incorporated and maintains its primary place of business in the United States. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 3:27 am
Newell, et al. v. [read post]
