Search for: "DOES I-X" Results 4081 - 4100 of 7,399
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2013, 10:32 am by Employment Lawyers
  I am not an expert in this area, but my answer to this question is - "Sometimes." [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 8:02 am
First, I would question their use of the term "average," which implies that lots of folks have plans with 70/30 or 90/10 (or even 60/40) levels. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 10:27 pm by Florian Mueller
I reported on a German VP8 patent infringement trial held two weeks ago and found out about another one coming up in mid-June. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 2:02 pm
  Tom Mitcheson commented that, in the light of this decision, it would probably be necessary to consult your lawyer before answering the question: does what I am doing constitute “making”? [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 1:49 pm by Lewis B Gainor
It provides the following rules for prison inmates: A defendant who is convicted of first degree murder (720 ILCS 5/9-1) or terrorism (720 ILCS 5/29D-14.1) does not get early release and must serve 100% of his sentence. 730 ILCS 5/3-6-3(a)(2)(i). [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 5:19 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  In 1996, Valencia started X One X to license images, including Lee’s, to third parties, something that AVELA now does too. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:00 am by Katherine Gallo
Washington (1942, CA5 La) 128 F2d 466 [x-ray examination using lipoidol]; Riss & Co. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 3:24 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Felix Wu / The Ontology of Speech Questions of the form “is X speech? [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 12:31 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  So it seems students are making the choice “should I pay or not? [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 9:29 pm
If a contractor in State X purchases materials and uses the material in a real property contract in State or Country Y, does the contactor owe use tax on purchases in State X? [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 9:00 am by Susannah Tredwell
There is also the element of serendipity; more than once I have been discussing a research issue with an articling student or a junior associate in the library, only to have a partner wander by and suggest that the student/associate might want to consider case X or textbook Y. [read post]