Search for: "Doe VI "
Results 4081 - 4100
of 5,650
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2011, 1:16 pm
And many see that they can actually make inroads with some voting blocs by railing against “activist judges”—by which they seem to mean any judges who reach results that the person hurling the ad hominem does not like. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 10:00 am
Appellee maintains the district court correctly concluded the WUCCC does not prohibit it from charging a fee for optional payment methods it offers to its customers after credit had been extended.Holdings: The Court upheld the reversal of the Administrator’s order.In an overview of the WUCCC, the Court discussed credit service charges as well as the additional, delinquency, deferral and limited default charges enumerated in the statute. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Section 1104, unlike §1104-a, does not give the respondent shareholder the right to purchase the petitioner's shares for fair value. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 9:24 am
Correlation does not prove causation.Correlation does not prove causation.Correlation does not prove causation. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 5:07 pm
Indeed, Jackson himself opposed the Bank of the United States because its federal charter gave it a legal privileged, monopoly status vis a vis all other banks. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
Articles 34 and 36 of the Uncitral Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: The Court's Discretion Amokura Kawharu Faculty of Law, University of Auckland Abstract: The opening paragraph of art 34(2) Model Law provides that “an arbitral award may be set aside by the court…”. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Kirk Baert has kindly permitted us to post his Application to the Supreme Court of Canada for leave to appeal the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 8:15 am
Expressing something in formulaic language, however, does not mean that what is being expressed is a law of nature. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 10:37 pm
The appellant has questioned the choice of the audit firm also, on the ground that the said firm does audit work for several companies belonging to different branches of the Birla Group, being the industrial house having presence in several areas in the corporate sector of this country. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 10:37 am
The Supreme Court’s fascination with the problems of preemption in recent years does not shed a lot of light on what the Court might do with the Arizona case. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:44 pm
It should be noted that accepting a claim does not mean the PR will pay the entire claim. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 5:42 pm
" You must verify vis-à-vis every lender in your area what their current reaffirmation/ride-through/repo policies are. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 5:48 pm
Fundamental differences in the priorities between the two mother companies can and does take place. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 3:47 pm
The level of taxation does not approximate the Spartan stand at Thermopylae or watching Clash of the Titans in 3-D. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 1:52 pm
The validity of this argument vis-à-vis corporate insiders is sharply contested. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 12:02 pm
Those entitled to free legal services are members of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes, women, children, persons with disability, victims of ethnic violence, industrial workmen, persons in custody, and those whose income does not exceed a level set by the government (currently it is Rs 1 lakh a year in most States). [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 8:05 am
Fundamental differences in the priorities between the two mother companies can and does take place. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 12:55 am
Here is the abstract: This Article does not address all Sunday closing laws in effect today, but limits its focus to Sunday closing laws having to do with alcohol-Sunday liquor laws. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:10 pm
This kale conundrum also implicates the broader issue of parodies on products vis-à-vis trademark law. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
The Guidelines (C-VI 4.6) stipulated that the DE had to contact the applicant if there were further deficiencies.The ED granted interlocutory revision but did not grant the request for reimbursement, which was transmitted to the Board.Here is the provisional opinion of the Board, which has become definitive because the applicant did not comment on it and had withdrawn his request for oral proceedings:*** Translation of the German original ***[1] First it is to be noted, with respect to the… [read post]
