Search for: "Doe VI"
Results 4081 - 4100
of 5,623
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2011, 4:00 pm
What does SOPA have to do with all of this? [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:36 am
VI, §13. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 12:31 am
No deprivation of liberty The appeal was allowed, P’s care plan at Z house does not involve a deprivation of liberty Lord Justice Munby, giving the leading judgement, reviews some of the key case law on Deprivation of Liberty and provides a useful summary of the underlying principles at para 102: i) The starting point is the “concrete situation”, taking account of a whole range of criteria such as the “type, duration, effects and manner of implementation” of… [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 2:47 pm
Hale (213) 617-5513 chale@sheppardmullin.com [1] The Rule addresses only personal conflicts of interest in supporting the Government's acquisition functions, and does not extend to other areas that are not so closely associated with inherently Government functions, i.e., functions that only the Government can perform. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 12:36 pm
Hale (213) 617-5513 chale@sheppardmullin.com [1] The Rule addresses only personal conflicts of interest in supporting the Government's acquisition functions, and does not extend to other areas that are not so closely associated with inherently Government functions, i.e., functions that only the Government can perform. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:41 pm
My intuition is that this has it backwards--that things may be worse to the extent that universities assume any investigatory and regulatory role vis-a-vis serious criminal conduct. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 8:21 am
For example, does Y get anything if X signed a sales contract to sell the Marco Island condominium before his death, but the sale didn't close until after he died? [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 12:53 am
This process of deregulation through the mechanism of disinvestments has brought to the fore several questions as to its legal validity vis-à-vis safeguarding the constitutional credo of socialism and the vision of our founding fathers to ensure state control of key economic sectors. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 6:46 pm
(Exactly why European governments fund NGOs whose views diametrically oppose the governments’ official policies vis a vis Israel is an interesting question that we’ll leave to another time).These NGOs are often given special legitimacy in the international media because they are purportedly Israeli NGOs. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 1:04 pm
On the ground that, vis-a-vis Jeffrey, he's simply getting what he expected. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 10:39 am
Our right to seclusion vis-à-vis one another and our right to be free from unreasonable searches under the Fourth Amendment are not perfectly on all fours, but the big issues are similar. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:30 pm
What the article does not point out clearly is that China can also quickly put down any hint of dissent and this puts them in a superior position vis-a-vis the trade unions and other civil society. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 3:07 pm
One would have to argue, I suppose, that there is a conflict underway vis-a-vis Hezbollah, with the domestic authority to participate in the conflict resting on Article II inherent authority to engage in national self-defense. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 8:32 am
Likewise, the United States Constitution does not require counsel for indigent defendants seeking post-conviction relief. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 3:44 pm
Although this list is not exhaustive, it does deal with some of the more common and prominent concerns. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
There was no reason to exclude cases which fell within the ambit of the literal words of Reg 8(2)vi) In the present case, the review officer had rejected the original decision that Mr M was intentionally homeless, but confirmed the decision that Mr M did not have priority need. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
There was no reason to exclude cases which fell within the ambit of the literal words of Reg 8(2)vi) In the present case, the review officer had rejected the original decision that Mr M was intentionally homeless, but confirmed the decision that Mr M did not have priority need. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 11:46 am
Since the suit for partition was instituted only in the year 1991, after coming into force of the AP Amendment Act, 1986, the decision of the Supreme Court, granting equal share to the daughters in the coparcenery property along with the sons in the family IS ABSOLUTELY CORRECT.BUT THE REASONING GIVEN BY THE SUPREME COURT FOR ARRIVING AT THE SAID DECISION APPEARS TO BE WRONG FOR THE REASONS:According to classical Hindu Law, some of the circumstances in which partition can take… [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 9:57 am
Courts as well often interpret federal law in ways that favor judicial power vis a vis the other branches. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 2:21 am
Thereby an approach comparable to Article VI(3) of the European Convention may be a suitable solution. [read post]
