Search for: "Does, A-H" Results 4081 - 4100 of 16,610
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2015, 6:43 am by David Markus
The Court determined that “[h]aving liability turn on whether a ‘reasonable person’ regards the communication as a threat—regardless of what the defendant thinks”—is insufficient for a conviction under § 875(c). [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 7:19 am by Dan Ernst
[Via H-Law we have the following CFP.]The Journal of Commonwealth and Postcolonial Studies, Spring 2018 Special Issue: Law and Literature from the Global South. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
” The EEOC noted that “[h]ad all of the physical and emotional distress experienced by . . . [read post]
The FCA does not define “employee,” and dictionaries do not limit the definition of “employee” to “current employee. [read post]
22 Sep 2024, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
This California trend-setting, however, does not appear to be going anywhere. [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 10:00 pm
The Supreme Court affirmed finding that the notice requirement of Rule 32(h) does not extend to a "variance" from the recommended guidelines range. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 10:35 am
The noun ‘háð’ is, however, linked etymologically to the verb ‘hæðast’, which is usually used in the sense of ‘sneer at, mock’. [read post]
17 May 2007, 5:23 am
  That, however, does not change the board's obligation to do its job. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 1:01 am
Here is why, if you haven’t already realized it: If a RSO is registered and does re-offend, the number of RSOs on the registry does NOT increase, it stays the same. [read post]
The point is well made by H and P and Tobin that it is all very well for the Supreme Court judges in HJ (Iran) to identify the right of gay persons to live openly, but what precisely does that mean in international human rights terms? [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 7:46 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
In fact, in one place the Constitution does seem to create a duty on the second actor to make an up-or-down decision; if the president does not return a bill passed by Congress to Congress with reasons for his veto within 10 days, the bill becomes law. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 12:40 pm
What additional costs does an annuitant have to incur to enforce those rights under that scenario? [read post]