Search for: "Does 1 - 20" Results 4081 - 4100 of 28,852
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2013, 3:52 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The report does not set forth the basis for these conclusions which are inconsistent with the statements of the defendant. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 11:07 am
City of Middletown (Dec. 20, 2007), is by no means groundbreaking; the facts of the case allow the court to sidestep some issues by simply finding a lack of evidence to support some of the claims. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 9:02 pm by Dan Flynn
The on-site equivalence verification audit team from FSIS visited Spain from May 20 through June 5, 2019. [read post]
9 May 2017, 9:49 am by Dennis Crouch
Patent No. 6,945,013 claims 18-20 (aseptic bottling at > 100 bottles per minute). [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:38 am by Robin Shea
Justice Ginsburg dissented, joined by Justice Sotomayor, and joined by Justices Breyer and Kagan as to all but Part III-C-1 (arguing that for-profit corporations cannot “exercise religion”). [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 4:01 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
  Therefore, by the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby direct the following: Section 1. [read post]
The provision of Section 12a (1) sentence 1 German Labour Court Law by which the opposing party’s legal fees are not reimbursed in the first instance does not apply in such a case. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 2:46 pm by Nassiri Law
On average, health care workers are 20 times more likely to be injured in an act of workplace violence than other types of employees. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 8:13 am
I have a much different view than that of my colleagues. * * * In sum, Indiana Code section 12-26-15-1(a), like its predecessor Indiana Code section 16-14-9.1-10, does not provide protection against the indefinite administration of anti-psychotic drugs against a patient's will. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:24 pm by Matthew C. Henderson and Arthur F. Coon
  While this blog does not ordinarily focus on unpublished appellate decisions, the recent case of Committee for Sound Water and Land Development v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 1:35 am by Giorgio Luceri
This was called upon to decide on the scope of the claim raised under Article 7(1)(c) EUTMR where a sign is a geographical name. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:11 am by INFORRM
In no sense does this betoken some indiscriminate exposure of sensitive information held by public authorities to general scrutiny. [read post]