Search for: "Does 1-29" Results 4081 - 4100 of 12,793
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2011, 5:31 am by Howard Wasserman
Brickey, No. 1:10CV00060, 2011 WL 652735, at *12 n.4 (W.D. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:44 pm
"Thursday, March 29, 1 p.m.-3 p.m.? [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 2:30 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Under German insolvency law, the debtor does not lose its legal capacity even if it loses the power to administer and dispose of the insolvency estate (see Schulte, Patentgesetz mit EPÜ, 10th edition, Introduction, paragraph 217).3.3 For the reasons stated above, the board had no reason to interrupt t [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 1:47 pm by WIMS
The President said the $20 billion is not a cap and does not limit BP's liability, responsibility or legal challenges. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 11:55 pm
Tamara de Silva Chicago, Illinois November 29, 2011 R. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 11:48 am by John L. Welch
" Not Primarily Merely a Surname Section 2(e)(5) - Functionality: Precedential No. 32: TTAB Finds Bands on Mag Rechargeable Flashlight Functional, Lacking in Acquired Distinctiveness Section 2(f) - acquired distinctiveness: Precedential No. 42: TTAB Affirms Refusal to Register Shape of Chevron's "Pole Spanner Sign" as Non-DistinctivePrededential No. 34: TTAB Affirms Refusal to Register "Beer Glass and Stand" Packaging for Lack of DistinctivenessPrecedential No. 32: TTAB… [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:00 am by INFORRM
On 29 November 2011, the Chamber to which the case had been allocated relinquished jurisdiction in favour of the Grand Chamber. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 5:30 am by Ralf Michaels
The CISG does not distinguish between private law and public law entities and is not limited to contracts between private parties.[1] It is therefore applicable to sales contracts concluded by public law entities such as States if these entities do not act in exercise of their sovereign powers but iure gestionis like a private person could act as well,[2] irrespective of whether a public law tender procedure has preceded the conclusion of the contract.[3] The tender process that… [read post]
25 May 2019, 11:00 am by Race to the Bottom
T-Mobile’s purchase of Sprint for $26 billion was announced almost a year ago on April 29, 2018 and continues to endure questioning from regulators. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 6:31 am
That is kind of what the U.S. did: In a reservation submitted on September 29, 2006, the U.S. reserved the right not to apply Article 6(1)(b), as well as one provision of Article 6(1)(a) "with respect to devices designed or adapted primarily for the purpose of committing the offenses established in Article 4 (`Data interference') and Article 5 (`System interference')". [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 3:45 am by Simon Holzer
On 29 February 2016, the Plaintiff appealed the ruling of the Federal Patent Court to the Federal Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 4:45 pm
The appellant maintains that this disclaimer does not comply with the requirements of A 123(2) EPC. [29] [… T]here is a specific disclosure of the use of botulinum toxin in the treatment of lacrimation in the application as filed. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 3:20 am by Mi Patente
” Indeed, in this particular case, it is obvious that beer Cannabis does not contain any illegal substances nor in illegal amounts. [read post]