Search for: "English v. English"
Results 4081 - 4100
of 11,196
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2017, 4:00 am
Each Wednesday we tell you which three English-language cases and which French-language case have been the most viewed* on CanLII and we give you a small sense of what the cases are about. [read post]
2 May 2017, 6:34 am
It was suggested that Birss J was effectively making a decision about specific performance of the undertaking in the English court (although he never actually used that phrase). [read post]
1 May 2017, 7:26 am
., Serial No. 86321169 [Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal of GOLDENBERRY for "fresh fruits"].May 2, 2017 -2 PM: In re Red Lobster Hospitality, LLC, Serial Nos. 85179591 and 85179618 [refusal to register the mark shown below, in color and in black-and-white, for "restaurant services and restaurant carry-out services," without a disclaimer of LOBSTER].May 4, 2017 -2 PM: Advanced California Innovative Institute, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 6:43 am
In the last couple of years there's been Led Zeppelin v Spirit and Marvin Gaye (the estate of) v Robin Thicke and Pharrell WilliamsAs a recent programme on BBC Radio 4 showed, there is a lot of activity in the area - with a new profession of forensic musicologist emerging as an important part of the picture. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 4:29 pm
In the case of Alexis v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:59 am
We are intimately familiar with the rules of evidence, both statutory and uncodified, and understand the rationale for the counterintuitive principle expressed in Browne v Dunn. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 4:00 am
In Chamberlain Group v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 6:24 am
Mazer v Stein, 347 US 201, 214 (1954) concerns the protection of lamps. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:00 am
Each Wednesday we tell you which three English-language cases and which French-language case have been the most viewed* on CanLII and we give you a small sense of what the cases are about. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 9:49 am
Ferguson to Brown v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
Finally, in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:12 am
Jogee corrected the historic mistake in Chan Wing-Siu [1984] UKPC 27 and R v Powell/English [1997] UKHL 57 of equating foresight with intent to assist in cases of alleged secondary participation. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am
And with respect to the President, in particular, it is what undergirds the Supreme Court’s decision in Clinton v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:52 am
Nelson v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 4:00 am
The well-known case commonly referred to as Eric v. [read post]
22 Apr 2017, 3:25 am
Justice Arnold is a distinguished jurist from the English High Court and author of numerous copyright and other intellectual property decisions. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 1:39 pm
Case Citation: Metter v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 6:59 am
Sir Robin Jacob suggested that the test was far too complicated and needed simplification although Klaus noted that the German test bore strong similarities to the Improver test devised by the English Court. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 2:44 am
Brian Corderyby Steven Willis Given the furore surrounding Birss J’s decision on the non-technical issues in Unwired Planet v Huawei earlier this month, which included the first determination of FRAND terms by an English Court (reported on by my colleague Rachael here), it would have been easy to miss the first appellate Court judgment on the related technical issues which was handed down last week. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:05 pm
Although the Court declined to express “a concluded view” on the application in English law of the rule in MGN v UK, it is apparent that it [read post]
