Search for: "Good v. Good"
Results 4081 - 4100
of 76,232
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2023, 1:39 pm
That decision, notably, forces parties to negotiate royalties in good faith before they can pursue judicial remedies, such as ASIs. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 1:17 pm
Really, really well done.The good thing about this one is that it's a straightforward and (relatively) non-political fight, even though it's about whether a particular Indian tribe gets fees from California for not negotiating in good faith about a gambling compact. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 1:11 pm
See also ROONEY V. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 11:23 am
., LLC v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
In 2019, the Second Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
On April 3, 2023, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) issued a policy statement regarding what constitutes an “abusive” act or practice (the “Policy Statement”).[1] The Policy Statement outlines the CFPB’s approach to analyzing whether an act or practice may be abusive and provides examples, which the Policy Statement also notes may be used by state attorneys general or other agencies that are authorized to enforce the prohibition on… [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:51 pm
Let’s start off with what I consider to be the “good” proposals: The Good 314(a) – Codify Apple v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 12:36 pm
The case is People v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 8:55 am
., Davison v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a precedential opinion in FS.com v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a precedential opinion in FS.com v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:04 am
Judge Posner suggested something of this nature, positing in Gracen v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:53 am
The latter rule of law treats material prepared for a client, such as an entity’s owner, as a “property right,” and a law firm has a “general duty to provide that material . . . upon . . . request absent a substantial showing of good cause to refuse client access” (Sage Realty Corp. v Proskauer Rose Goetz & Mendelsohn LLP, 294 AD2d 190 [1st Dept 2002]). [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:30 am
“The essence of a continuous representation toll is the client’s confidence in the attorney’s ability and good faith, such that the client cannot be expected to question and assess the techniques employed or the manner in which the services are rendered” (Farage v Ehrenberg, 124 AD3d at 167). [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 3:46 am
Corp. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am
The Conversation has a piece explaining why the settlement is good news for all media outlets. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
Good morning, Chairman McHenry, Ranking Member Waters, and members of the Committee. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 2:54 pm
(c); see Donkin v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 1:08 pm
[And good luck challenging the law. [read post]
