Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 4081 - 4100
of 82,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2022, 2:26 pm
Alliance HC Holding LLC, ,16 F 4.th 393 (3d Cir. 2021), held the opposite. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 1:00 am
Factual background The appellant, Mr Charles McCann has been detained as a patient of the State Hospital, Carstairs since the mid-1990s. [read post]
1 May 2012, 11:59 am
The case of People v. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 7:18 am
In People v Collins, the court of appeals held that Michigan courts have jurisdiction over “victimless” offenses committed by non-Indians on Indian lands located within the state. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 5:08 pm
The Supreme Court decided Hemphill v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 8:06 am
See United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:53 am
An excerpt: On Tuesday in United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 11:40 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 3:24 pm
Recently, the Wisconsin Supreme Court in Parsons v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:44 pm
However, the court held in CARACHURI-ROSENDO v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 2:48 pm
The failure to do so may violate the principles set forth in Brady v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 6:33 am
Put another way, the underlying impulse here "reflects a deeply held impulse in common law adjudication, which is far more nuanced than mere animus toward the modern administrative state. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 4:01 pm
Peleg v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:21 am
However, such a result is possible: in O’Brien v Ministry of Justice ECJ C-393/10 (01 March 2012), the Supreme Court held that a judge was a ‘worker’ for the purposes of EU law (specifically the Part-Time Workers Framework Directive 97/81/EC). [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 2:33 am
US v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 10:28 pm
Perfect 10 v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
(Barquis v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 12:12 pm
See United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 6:29 am
The Supreme Court held in Pyler v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 2:05 am
Thus the Supreme Court held that the policy of ‘deport first; appeal later’ is a violation of human rights as an appeal against a deportation order by reference to a claim in respect of private and family life under ECHR, art 8 should be effective, and this means there must be an opportunity for appellants to give live evidence to assist the tribunal. [read post]
