Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 4081 - 4100
of 4,275
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2016, 2:33 pm
Second, irrespective of whether the target performs classified work, the parties must consider the role of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:15 am
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 12:27 pm
United States, Hanna and the firms argued that the IRS is required to notify them and that the summonses should therefore be quashed. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:24 am
Case citation: The Authors’ Guild, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 12:22 pm
Omega concedes that it designed and secured copyright protection for the Globe Design for the purpose of using copyright law to restrict the unauthorized sale of Omega watches in the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:03 pm
(A copy of the panel’s decision in Hamdan v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 2:23 pm
Fifth, there is a sense that politicians the world over, notably including the United States, are preoccupied with the very near term and are simply postponing the day of reckoning with the world’s economic problems that grew out of the financial crisis of September 2008 and the ensuing global economic crisis, which is still with us. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 5:29 am
"United States v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 4:02 pm
. ''Casey'' Ebsary has just obtained an Internal Policy Memorandum on Charging and Sentencing that was just circulated to Assistant United States Attorneys. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 8:18 pm
Xenotransplantation and Patent Law Biological patents are generally utility patents, which allow the patent holder to exclude others from making, selling, using, or importing their biological invention for a specified period of time, currently twenty years in the United States. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:54 am
And a federal court has recently agreed, because on April 10, 2014, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California ruled that A’lor is barred from infringing CHARRIOL cable trademarks by selling ALOR jewelry that uses such cable. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 10:05 am
That there exist Russian expatriates in the United States who support Putin does not compel a finding that the February 27 Policy facially discriminates against them. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:26 am
” Plessy v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm
[ii] Nearly one out of every 11 United States publicly traded companies faced a securities lawsuit in 2019. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:21 pm
Some states require the plaintiff to provide a specific trade secret disclosure document before discovery commences. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:21 pm
Some states require the plaintiff to provide a specific trade secret disclosure document before discovery commences. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 9:00 pm
At the federal level, United States trademark law is governed by the Trademark Act of 1946, or the Lanham Act, which provides for, among other [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 11:00 am
United States, a case pending in the First Circuit that I posted about in December and in an debate last spring with today’s most tireless free speech advocate, David Cole. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 11:22 am
Bank v. [read post]
