Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 4081 - 4100
of 4,275
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2008, 11:53 pm
(As amended in 2006, the Lanham Act requires that a mark be "widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IP finance), MARQUES international advertising portal goes live: (Class 46) Global - Patents Using patent landscaping analytics to improve the quality of M & A decisions: a review of Cox Enterprises’ $300M purchase of Adify: (IP Asset Maximiser Blog), Universities reap royalty rewards; investors ignore IP at their peril: (IAM), Top IP-owning nations claim faster patent processing; near harmonisation deal: (Intellectual Property Watch), Bosch, Xerox and Dupont sign up… [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 1:12 am
First, Section 602(a) of Title 17 of the United States Code states that importation of copyrighted works obtained outside the United States without the authorization of the US copyright holder is infringement under section 106. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
§ 602(a), which states unauthorized importation is a violation of the copyright holder's distribution right. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 12:20 pm
Code § 2318:The United States criminal code, Title 18, criminalizes certain copyright violations. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 3:23 am
Parker-Hannifin Corp. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 7:18 am
Especially since like most contracts, there is a strong likelihood that if you end up litigating a Creative Commons brand license in the United States it will be enforced. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 7:32 am
” Sassi-Lehner v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 10:01 pm
I use the recent United States Supreme Court case Kelo v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 10:43 pm
This month, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit addressed these issues in one of the first cases involving open source computer software. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 10:19 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 2:14 pm
United States, 213 F.3d 1366, 1369 (Fed. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 3:30 pm
In Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 2:57 am
However, I am still somehow unconvinced by divorcing licences from the issue of contracts (at least in the United States). [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 8:27 pm
Today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has overtured a lower court’s decision in Jacobsen v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 7:18 pm
Another brief, supporting a new trial, came jointly from the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), Public Knowledge, United States Internet Industry Association, and Computer & Communications Industry Association. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 11:31 am
That changed on October 26, 2006, when the Florida Supreme Court ruled in State v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 6:11 pm
When Gillet discovered that plaintiffs were selling similar pliers in the United States, the company sued them for patent infringement. [read post]
