Search for: "Husband v. Wife"
Results 4081 - 4100
of 6,701
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2012, 7:06 am
On May 31, the First Circuit unanimously affirmed the judgment of the Massachusetts federal district court that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act, which provides that, for purposes of federal law, marriage is “only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife,” is unconstitutional. [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:04 am
” Section 3 defines “marriage” under federal law as “only a legal union of one man and one woman, as husband and wife” and “spouse” as a person of the opposite sex. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:30 am
The case of Bowers v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 2:00 pm
Maybury v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:02 am
Lower courts ruled the wife and son were not eligible for asylum in the U.S., because their fears were not based on something happening to the family as a group (for which asylum would be available), but because of their ties to the husband. [read post]
29 May 2012, 7:21 am
Maybury v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 7:21 am
Maybury v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:53 am
Several privacy and antitrust complaints are now menacing Google. [read post]
28 May 2012, 3:27 pm
In Hollywood Medical Center v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm
Prince Albert of Monaco and his wife, Charlene Wittstock, are suing the Sunday Times for £300,000 in libel damages, reports Press Gazette and the London Evening Standard. [read post]
27 May 2012, 1:56 pm
In PPL v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:05 am
The blast tore off his lower right leg and two fingers, and embedded bomb fragments in his wife’s leg. [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:17 am
In Morgan v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:52 am
Knight v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:37 am
Background The plaintiffs were husband and wife and were Deputies in the States of Jersey Assembly (“the States”). [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:01 pm
Here, the wife made such a motion. [read post]
22 May 2012, 2:35 pm
Richmond v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:34 am
” Davis v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:15 am
Toler v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:27 am
She was the wife in a divorce where the husband was able to take the couples assets into bankruptcy during the period between the grant of an order against him and the entry, and in doing so took millions away from the rightful wife. [read post]
