Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: S. M., A CHILD" Results 4081 - 4100 of 5,731
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2010, 1:13 am by Garry J. Wise, Wise Law Office, Toronto
Just as the introduction of the Child Support Guidelines eliminated a huge proportion of the nation's litigation over quantum of child support, a rebuttable presumption of joint custody could take most custody squabbles of the table. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 5:28 am by Michael Scutt
  The case will be heard in February and I will be watching with interest. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 5:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
In any event, even if I’m mistaken as to one or another of these items, I doubt that it satisfies all three of the prongs. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 8:50 am by SOIssues
[name withheld] got the ink two weeks prior, in early July, when he heard that a Canadian Football League team was interested in signing him. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 9:05 am
I'm talking about first offenders in misdemeanor cases or garden variety felony cases such as burglary or parental discipline type physical child abuse cases (this was known as a spanking when I was a kid) being held without bail or on bails set so high that they are the functional equivalent of no bail. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 10:21 am by Matt Brown
People often mistake your stupid questions for expressions of genuine interest too. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 3:26 am by SHG
Sorry, but I'm not the broad-minded a person. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 1:35 pm by Narine Bagdassarian
  However, the interesting twist in the Righthaven scenario seems to be that even bloggers who re-post columns and provide the appropriate links and credits to the work are targeted for lawsuits.[6] So….what’s a blogger to do to protect himself or herself from the monstrosity that is Righthaven? [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 7:56 pm by Ed
" I'm glad the State Bar is seeking to do something about this. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 12:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Helping your kid's doctor Listen to Tip Interested? [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 12:56 pm
I'm utterly fascinated by this one.It's a tax opinion. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 9:10 am
In the latter sort of case, in the Fourth Amendment context, the Supreme Court has shown little interest in interrogating police officers' true motivations when they otherwise have all that they need to perform a lawful stop. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 6:24 am by Kelly
It’s gone for 2011 which is probably a welcome sight for many tax preparers (that Schedule M was a bear). [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 7:48 am by Susan Cartier Liebel
I’m looking for mall town/rural solos at all stages of their careers who are interested in sharing their insights and experiences practicing law in rural America. [read post]