Search for: "London, Appeal of" Results 4081 - 4100 of 5,582
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2011, 9:55 pm
Merpel sincerely hopes that whoever writes for it is allowed to be more enjoyable than the product of the authors of some of the Board of Appeal decisions she reads, which seem to have had any possible interest surgically removed before publication. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Two strikes that were planned separately – by the RMT on London’s Docklands Light Railway and by Aslef on London Midland – were halted by injunctions in the High Court in December. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 8:34 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd v Eurosail – UK 2007 – 3bl Plc & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 227 (07 March 2011) Sousa v London Borough of Waltham Forest Council [2011] EWCA Civ 194 (03 March 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) ZAM v CFW & Anor [2011] EWHC 476 (QB) (07 March 2011) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:22 am by INFORRM
In the Courts On 28 February and 1 March 2011, the Court of Appeal heard the appeal and cross appeal in the case of Baturina v Times Newspapers. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 10:30 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
  Thanks to the sterling work of the Institute for Advanced Legal Studies at the University of London, all case law from the Court of Appeal and most from divisions of the High Court are available from Bailii.org.uk. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 9:08 pm by Simon Gibbs
The Court of Appeal decision in Sousa v London Borough of Waltham Forest [2011] EWCA Civ 194 may be (but probably won’t be) the final word on what the law currently is in relation to recoverability of success fees. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 3:11 am by Charon QC
Dismissing the firm’s appeal, Cranston said: ‘The outcome may seem harsh. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 9:20 pm by Simon Gibbs
Judgment was handed down yesterday by the Court of Appeal in Sousa v London Borough of Waltham Forest [2011] EWCA Civ 194. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 9:05 pm by GuestPost
The recent decision of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal in the case of A.H. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 8:33 am by Dave
Even so, nearly a third of properties will still be affordable to Housing Benefit customers in London. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:28 pm by Simon Gibbs
In Sibthorpe & Morris v London Borough of Southwark [2011] EWCA Civ 25 the Court of Appeal declined to strike down as unlawful (on the basis of champerty) CFAs where the claimants’ solicitors agreed to indemnify the claimants against adverse costs orders. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:57 pm by NL
No cardboard or sleeping bags to sully the royalist tourists’ views of London. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 5:32 am
 Despite being of apparently sane mind, Bratin is running the London Marathon on 17 April. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:31 am by Melina Padron
As the UK awaits the ECtHR Grand Chamber’s decision in Khawaja and Tahery v UK, both the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal have held that hearsay evidence was compatible with article 6. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 6:23 am
In this case (on appeal from [2009] EWCA Civ 490), a five-judge bench unanimously upheld an appeal allowing a local authority to rely on an exception [...] [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 11:48 am by Betsy McKenzie
I stumbled on an excellent review essay by him the the Times (of London) Review of Books. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 5:25 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Thompson, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 102 (03 February 2011) Moss, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 252 (1 February 2011) Thornley, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 153 (26 January 2011) Webb, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 152 (26 January 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Ceva Logistics Ltd v Lynch & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 188 (25 February 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Francotyp-Postalia Ltd v Whitehead & Ors [2011] EWHC 367 (Ch) (25 February 2011) High Court… [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:13 am by Beth Graham
Jan. 31, 2011), and its implications on the pending Second and Fifth Circuit appeals in  Scandinavian Reinsurance Co. v. [read post]