Search for: "Long v. Williams"
Results 4081 - 4100
of 4,800
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2010, 7:33 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Williams v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 4:10 am
Cumbie v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 1:18 am
So, during oral arguments at the Supreme Court on Monday in Astrue v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:15 pm
So long as an illegal sentence is subject to correction, a defendant cannot claim a legitimate expectation that the originally-imposed, improper sentence is final for all purposes (see United States v Fogel, 829 F2d 77, 87 [DC Cir 1987])...Yet, there must be a temporal limitation on a court's ability to resentence a defendant (see generally DeWitt v Ventetoulo, 6 F3d at 34-35) since criminal courts do not have perpetual jurisdiction over all persons who were once… [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 7:31 am
School Dist. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 6:27 am
Still, I can't help but wonder about how long her pain and suffering was in this case. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 5:41 pm
Morrison v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 4:37 pm
v=mHV4nDS501Y -- afforded reason enough to suspect something along these lines even before the latest Republican volte face on the individual mandate. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 8:31 am
Aftermath of Brane v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:01 am
Kurz v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:05 am
When Justice William O. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 9:42 am
When Justice William O. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 6:04 am
” [4] With respect to a board’s unconscious failure to act, Rales v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:13 pm
I applauded when the South Carolina Court of Appeals issued its 2008 opinion in Camp v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 4:31 am
The special meeting proposals are part of a successful multi-year campaign by Nick Rossi, William Steiner, and other retail investors affiliated with John Chevedden, a long-time shareholder activist based in southern California. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 4:26 am
My vote of course is for Loving v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 5:02 am
A very long shot. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 4:49 am
Feldman; a rare engagement, she says.At stake is the oral argument scheduled before the high court on March 2 in the Second Amendment case of McDonald v City of Chicago. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 6:57 am
“Here and Now” actually ran a couple of snippets featuring argument by William Canby Jr. for the Petitioner and John Frank for the Respondent. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 7:35 am
” More significant was his draft opinion in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
