Search for: "M. B.1."
Results 4081 - 4100
of 13,696
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2017, 2:24 pm
" (See Section 703.140(b)(1) of the California Code of Civil Procedure.) [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 4:09 pm
For all you IRS agents reading this post, I’m just kidding. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 9:11 pm
”Como se observa a los extranjeros se les reconoce el derecho a la visitar consular, derecho que fuera recogido luego en la Convención de Viena sobre Relaciones Consulares, del 24 de abril de 1963, cuyo artículo 36 numeral 1 dice:“1. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 7:08 am
Doe 1 v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:05 pm
“[I]f the court finds that a maintenance award is appropriate, the court shall order guideline maintenance” 750 ILCS 5/503(b-1) A “[m]aintenance award in accordance with guidelines. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 6:43 pm
I‘m sorry, but I’m laughing my ass off over here. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 9:19 am
Now of course this question comes up in lots of other enforcement situations as well, which is why I’m blogging about it. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 7:12 am
As Carl points out: Since the Defense of Marriage Act currently prohibits the filing of joint federal income tax returns by gay married couples, that means all gay married couples in New York will not be able to file a joint New York income tax return this year, unless (a) the statute is changed to permit gay couples an exception from 651(b)(1) or (b) the DTF [Department of Taxation and Finance] issues guidance giving gay couples such an exception. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 8:17 am
Dena M. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 1:17 am
The appellant relied on the case of M’Bodj v Kingdom of Belgium (C-542/13) [2015] 1 WLR 3059, amongst others, to argue that whilst ‘pure’ health cases – which merely concern shortcomings in healthcare in the country of origin, but no ‘conduct’ on the part of the State giving rise to serious harm – are excluded from the scope of Article 15(b), not all health cases are. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 8:17 am
Dena M. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
Paragraph 1 bars extradition for political offenses; the political offense exception is longstanding under U.S. extradition practice. [read post]
6 May 2015, 7:54 pm
The Office of Legislative Research does a good job recapping it so for this post, I’m simply going to provide the salient points from the report and provide a link to the recap. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:13 pm
I’m reminded of Denedo v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 1:25 pm
[Sec. 101(2)(B)] In the case of an adjudication related to the mental health of a person or a commitment of a person to a mental institution, a record of which may not be provided to the Attorney General under paragraph (1), including because of the absence of a finding described in subparagraph (C) of such paragraph, or from which a person has been granted relief under a program established under subparagraph (A) or (B), or because of a removal of a record under section… [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:41 am
“In an action to recover damages for alleged legal malpractice, pro se plaintiff moves for an order granting default judgment against Russo & Gould LLP and Russo & Toner LLP (collectively, Russo defendants) (Motion Seq. 1), Russo defendants cross-move for an order extending their time to appear in the action (Motion Seq. 2), and Daniel M. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 11:34 am
Juni 2011 E. 1.). [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 9:55 am
§ 353(b)(1). [read post]
12 May 2010, 11:56 pm
Pour rappel, les questions étaient les suivantes : 1. [read post]
14 May 2019, 10:57 am
” G.S. 8C-1, Rule 803(7). [read post]
