Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 4081 - 4100
of 21,685
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2022, 4:16 pm
[Last week's argument at the Supreme Court in 303 Creative v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 10:36 pm
So held the United States Supreme Court on Monday, resoundingly, if a bit uneasily, in Iancu v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:39 am
(Citations, quotation marks, and ellipses omitted). [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 4:01 pm
The basic right to a jury in a criminal case had been extended to the states 11 years earlier, in the 1968 decision in Duncan v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 2:04 am
Hokie Objective Onomastics Society LLC v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 3:21 pm
The case cite is Skydive Arizona, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 7:56 am
In an op-ed for National Review, Reed Hopper and Mark Miller argue that, “to preserve a healthy habitat for property rights, the rule of law, and fundamental common sense in environmental policy,” the Supreme Court should decide to hear Weyerhaeuser Co. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:18 pm
In Espinoza v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 1:33 pm
Supreme Court of Ohio: City of Barberton v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 1:33 pm
Supreme Court of Ohio: City of Barberton v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 9:17 am
Cohen v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 7:54 am
Circuit held that EPA lacked authority to create affirmative defenses for SSM events, NRDC v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 5:01 pm
Do they pay the villages, towns, and cities the lodging taxes that states often allow local governments to assess and collect? [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 1:14 pm
" Wiwa v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
Circuit in People's Mojahedin Org. of Iran v. [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 4:49 pm
It's Case 1641/02 OAO Plodovaya Kompaniya v Russia, judgment being given on 7 June.In 1966 the USSR Ministry of Foreign Trade created the State Export and Import Agency Soyuzplodoimport. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 10:13 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:00 am
Considering that the marks used by the Defendant are identical to the AUDI Trademarks, initial-interest confusion is likely. * Dish Network LLC v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 8:57 pm
The case of Adcock Ingram v Cipla Medpro reconsidered the notion that pharmaceuticals sold on prescription are less likely to be confused because they are dispensed by trained professionals in regulated circumstances. [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:30 pm
Union v. [read post]
