Search for: "Paras v. State" Results 4081 - 4100 of 6,183
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2012, 7:44 am by Yvonne Daly
Damache v DPP [2012] IESC 11 centred on the constitutionality of s.29(1) of the Offences Against the State Act 1939, as amended by s.5 of the Criminal Law Act 1976. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 1:00 am by INFORRM
This has recently been developed from an understanding of the right as being a relatively narrow one, which is to do with receiving information that others are willing to impart (found in Leander v Sweden (1987) EHRR 43), to a relatively broad one, which now encompasses receiving information held by an organ of the state, free of unjustified administrative obstacles (found in Tarsasag a Szabadsagjogokert v Hungary (2009) ECHR 618 and Kenedi v Hungary (2009) ECHR… [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 7:12 am by emagraken
 Madam Justice Kirkpatrick provided the following reasons: [16] I first observe that this Court stated in Jones v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 2:00 am by Catherine Jasserand
For his defence, the producer claimed that the Austrian Copyright Law (Para. 38 (1) of Urheberrechtsgesetz) exclusively granted exploitation rights in the film to the producer and that any contract stating the contrary was void. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 11:22 am by Karwan Eskerie
” (para 99) Comment It would take a brave person indeed to envy the Court its task in a case such as this. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 11:42 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Belgium, ICJ Reports 2002, p. 3 paras 58 and 78). [read post]