Search for: "People v. Powers" Results 4081 - 4100 of 15,346
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2015, 4:25 pm by Andy
Here the quoted cases were White v Samsung, Wendt v Host International and Douglas v Mattel. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
Undeterred and emboldened by the power of repetition (and the "cut and paste" function in word) the ECHR then proceeded to say the same things (sometimes with reasonableness thrown in for good measure and/or confusion) in Cosic v Croatia, Zehentner v Austria and Paulic v Croatia. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
Undeterred and emboldened by the power of repetition (and the "cut and paste" function in word) the ECHR then proceeded to say the same things (sometimes with reasonableness thrown in for good measure and/or confusion) in Cosic v Croatia, Zehentner v Austria and Paulic v Croatia. [read post]
AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Advocate & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 46 As the prospect of a referendum on Scottish independence draws closer and those concerned with the destiny of British sterling, Scotch whisky and Chinese pandas intensify their discussions, questions have arisen meanwhile as to the legality of such a referendum and the judicial response to it. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 4:31 am by SHG
In a bizarre comparison, Nico Pitney at Huff Post compares Donald Trump with Louis Stokes, who argued for the petitioner in Terry v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 7:55 pm by Jon
This led to the key decision of Wickard v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:53 am by Dan Carvajal
Laws by their very nature divide people into different categories and subject them to differing treatment, but not all laws violate the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 12:44 pm by Ilya Somin
The event is being held around the two-year anniversary of the Supreme Court decision in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
The Chatbot reads the data and uses machine learning, algorithms, and its powerful processor to generate a response. 3. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:12 pm by Orin Kerr
“) (2) The decision expands the power of courts to determine the rules of our society. [read post]