Search for: "Reach v. State"
Results 4081 - 4100
of 37,353
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
In Gerard v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:19 am
” The editorial board of the Philadelphia Inquirer reaches the same conclusion. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Amendment to Civil Service Law §167(8) does not violate the compensation clause for certain judges set out in Article VI, §25[a] of the State Constitution Bransten v State of New York, 2017 NY Slip Op 08168, Court of AppealsIn 2011 the State-employee unions, in the course of collective bargaining, agreed to a percentage reduction to the State's employer contributions for health insurance to avoid layoff, salary freezes and unpaid furloughs.… [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 8:27 am
State v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 9:51 am
This ruling is based on Chavez v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:29 am
The background of Sackett v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:29 am
The background of Sackett v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:29 am
The background of Sackett v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:35 pm
This issue is jurisdictional, and it would need to be reexamined sua sponte before the Court could reach the merits. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 2:52 pm
Commonwealth v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 1:57 pm
Knotts and United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:27 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:01 pm
The majority did not reach the substantive question of whether the Federal government had actually overreached in pressuring the Interment services. [read post]
Test Wells Count as "Actual Physical Improvement" for Lien Priority, Michigan Court of Appeals Rules
29 Feb 2012, 6:20 pm
The Michigan Court of Appeals reached this conclusion in a recent unpublished case. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:53 pm
While Lawfare readers have been focused on other parts of the world, federal appellate courts have recently issued two significant, and potentially conflicting (in result, if not reasoning), decisions interpreting the extraterritorial reach of the Alien Tort Statute in light of the Supreme Court’s Kiobel decision. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 10:22 am
According to the State, the Supreme Court could not have concluded that “the Pension Clause is absolute” in Felt v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 3:02 am
“The Supreme Court should…reaffirm that the Constitution’s prohibition against ex post facto lawmaking forbids states from skirting constitutional scrutiny by simply labeling penalties as ‘civil'” [Ilya Shapiro and Nathan Harvey on Cato certiorari brief in Bethea v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 8:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:42 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New YorkOpinion Date: 3/1/10Cite: PrecisionIR, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
The State's contribution rate changed in 1983 after CSEA and other unions representing state employees reached a memorandum of understating (MOU), reducing that rate for individual coverage from 100% to 90%. [read post]
