Search for: "STATE v BUSH" Results 4081 - 4100 of 4,543
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2014, 4:57 am by Kinga Tibori-Szabó
This interpretation of imminence exceeds even the parameters of the 2002 Bush Doctrine. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 9:53 am by Mary L. Dudziak
Meanwhile, at Guantanamo and elsewhere, the United States holds enemy combatants “for the duration of hostilities. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:48 pm by Darren O'Donovan
This has elicited the usual philosophical responses, none more eloquent than our own Supreme Court in AG v O’Brien, that such policies ‘involve the State in moral defilement’. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:20 pm by Kevin Russell
After Garrett (which itself fell on the heels of Bush v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
: (GenericsWeb), Europe: New EBA referral T 1319/04 regarding patentability of known medicament for new treatment of same illness: (IPKat), Europe: Patentability of biotechnology in Europe: (IAM), Europe: New EPO Enlarged Board case referrals: T1319/04 Dosage Regimen, T1242/06 Essential Biological Process: (Hal Wegner), Thailand: Compulsory licensing: Affordable health for Thailand thanks to Matrix Labs: (Spicy IP), Thailand: European Parliament set to reprimand Mandelson for… [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Based on the quoted language, however, it appears to be the 2001 holding in Ohio v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:01 am by Steve Hall
Bush, an ardent supporter of the death penalty, in 2005 tried to force states to hold hearings on consular access in each case. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
(We all remember how a tight timeline affected the quality of judicial work product in complicated election matters in Bush v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:38 am by Transplanted Lawyer
Bush the Elder in 1989, and is presently the Chief Judge of the Northern District. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 12:28 pm by Marcia Coyle
” The court’s legitimacy has been challenged to varying degrees at other times in our history: the so-called Lochner era (when the court blocked social regulations of working conditions), the early New Deal (when the court thwarted President Roosevelt’s attempts to address the Depression), the Warren era (when the court’s liberal majority expanded civil rights and civil liberties), and the Bush v. [read post]