Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp" Results 4081 - 4100 of 4,115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2007, 6:26 am
Bring on Sherlock Holmes . . .and at least one lawyer, trained in evidence . . . pro bono publico.THE GERUM CLOAK MYSTERYThe more than 2000-year old Cloak of Gerum (photos and info below) provides us - as we will show - with the greatest "real" (non-fiction) cloak and dagger mystery of all time, unsolved up to now, but - as we allege - for the most part solved (but not entirely) in this posting.The technology that we use to solve this mystery is demonstrated in the following graphic -… [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 12:46 pm
Answer:          No, according to the Fourth District Court of Appeal, Division 3, in Laliberti v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 10:18 pm
The Fifth Amendment right to deprivation of liberty only based on facts proved beyond a reasonable doubt requires a different, and stricter level of compliance, as we know from the contrasting cases on retroactivity: "yes" on reasonable doubt (Ivan V. and Hankerson); "no" on judge rather than jury where the reasonable doubt right is intact (Summerlin).While addressing the Sixth Amendment, Cunningham clearly expresses the constitutional norm that increased punishment… [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 4:04 am
That question was recently put to the test in the case of McKesson Information Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 7:00 am by Womenstake blog
In sharp contrast, the current Administration opposed the use of affirmative action at the University of Michigan, and other efforts to promote diversity. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 4:17 pm
The Fort Wayne Journal Gazette has an editorial today supporting federal Judge Allen Sharp's ruling in Indiana Right to Life v. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 8:38 am
Call it Greenhouse v. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 9:13 pm
Here's a video interview from Geoff Sharp at the V-Blog Mediation Project. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 9:09 am
Over at Volokh, Prawfsblawg, and California Appellate Report, they're discussing People v. [read post]
23 Dec 2006, 6:52 pm
C-SPAN re-aired the Second Circuit argument in Fox v. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 5:45 pm
Thanks also to Webb Sanders for their hospitality during my visit - a really sharp and nice bunch of folks. [read post]
21 Dec 2006, 4:01 pm
explains the limitations of the allegedly pro-parfumier ruling against smell-alike scents in L'Oreal v Bellure (see blogs here and here), and there is even a delicious photo of a bunch trade mark enthusiasts enjoying themselves at the roulette table (surely not with their clients' money, speculates Merpel ...)Full contents and details of Trademark World hereMore on LG Philips v TatungA couple of things, in fact, arising from the IPKat's post on the recent Court of… [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 2:06 pm
  But my curmudgeonly fears were laid to rest earlier this week when the Supreme Court decided Carey v. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 1:10 pm
The judge found that the Respondent was a "perfectly clear" successor within the meaning of NLRB v. [read post]