Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 4081 - 4100
of 15,305
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2019, 8:27 am
The Patent/© clause of the Constitution isn’t helpful in figuring out what to do b/c there’s not enough from the Founders to interpret. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 8:25 am
”) Celestino v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
Counsel's perspective | Mr Justice Nugee and the Superhose: The potentiality of disclosure | Dutch Court of Appeal injuncts unwilling licensee in first post-Huawei v ZTE FRAND decision | English High Court seizes patent infringement jurisdiction once again | No knowledge in secondary copyright infringement of Eminem's first album | Ariana Grande, thank you, next: copyright infringement on Instagram | DSM Directive is now Directive 2019/790 and Member… [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 5:18 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:04 pm
In State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 3:21 pm
” Hawaii Stevedores, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am
§ 2105(c). [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:30 am
B. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
" * Interruption means separation from employment as a police officer "by reason of such officer's leave of absence, resignation or removal, other than removal for cause" (see General Municipal Law §209-q[1][c]). [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 4:45 pm
Fox v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 12:35 pm
B. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 7:52 am
The defendants argue that Asher’s opinions should be excluded because a) he did not base his opinions on enough facts or data. b) he did not conduct an investigation into the alleged causation asserted by the plaintiffs, and c) does not utilize appropriate or reliable principles or methodology. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 8:19 am
United States Postal Service (Supreme Court 2019) [Return Mail, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Notably, the petitioner did not testify that she had directed any of her aides to specifically supervise the student at the time of the incident.Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the determination of the Justice Center that the petitioner committed category three neglect (see Matter of Williams v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 151 AD3d at 1356-1357; see also Matter of Kelly v New York State… [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 3:38 am
Article 5.1 listed four, exclusive grounds for dissolution: “(a) the sale or other disposition of all of the assets of the Partnership; (b) a determination of the Partners to dissolve; (c) the bankruptcy or insolvency of a Partner . . .; or (d) the expiration of the term of the Partnership. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 3:19 am
Fair Isaac Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:00 am
Paten v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm
Céline Castets-Renard. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 2:59 pm
§ 1396p discusses support payments and eligibility, subsection (c)(2)(B)(iii) states that “[a]n individual shall not be ineligible for medical assistance by reason of paragraph (1) to the extent that … the assets … were transferred to … the individual’s child. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am
Defendant moved by notice of motion dated April 20, 2016, to dismiss the action based upon the plaintiffs failure to serve a complaint in accordance with CPLR 3012(b). [read post]
