Search for: "State v. Levell " Results 4081 - 4100 of 29,773
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2022, 9:42 am by SW
  Judgment was given under the old Departmental name, since changed to the snappy Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 7:32 am by Eleonora Rosati
Milano, Tecnica Group S.p.A. v Diana S.r.l., decision No 493/2021, 25 January 2021) in a copyright infringement case – decided nearly a year ago – that Tecnica successfully brought against the maker of Chiara Ferragni-branded after ski boots. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 7:24 am by SteveDowney
Second, you may request a Higher-Level Review by submitting VA Form 20-0996. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:51 am by Hayleigh Bosher
The main updates in this latest edition include:Coverage of BrexitAmendments to the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 made by the Digital Economy Act 2017 and the Copyright and Related Rights (Marrakesh Treaty etc) (Amendment) Regulations 2018Analysis of CJEU case law concerning copyright and related rights, and in particular the right of communication to the publicAnalysis of recent UK case law, such as Heythrop Zoological Gardens Ltd v Captive Animals Protection Society and Warner… [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am by familoo
Last week HHJ Dancey published a second judgment in a case involving allegations of rape and domestic abuse including coercive and controlling behaviour (the judgment is A Child (Application of PD12J : No.2 – Findings of Fact) [2022] EWFC 2). [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The alleged sum funneled through state party committees in that case was even larger: $112 million. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:36 pm by Eugene Volokh
And, to reiterate, the moderator had broached the subject of "actions at the state government level in Texas to override or preempt local government measures, such as regulation of ride sharing services and tree preservation ordinances. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Phil Dixon
Findings of fact failed to resolve material conflicts in the evidence from suppression hearing; denial of motion to suppress vacated and remanded for new findings State v. [read post]