Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 4081 - 4100
of 26,404
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2020, 9:21 am
In light of the extrinsic police report and extrinsic custody order, the district court granted summary judgment to State Farm. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
--City of East Lake v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 12:03 pm
’ State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 12:29 pm
Hulse v Thomas DiNapoli, as State Comptroller In 2001, petitioner, a 20-year old police officer for the Town of Ramapo Police Department, injured his back while lifting a large person to perform CPR. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 11:35 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 7:13 am
Stanford student Daniel Matro discusses last Wednesday’s oral argument in Corley v. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 7:47 am
Plaintiff also wins an equal protection argument because he was treated differently than two other inmates who also committed heinous crimes.The case is Reynolds v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 11:15 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Linda Patton v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 3:04 pm
See also United States v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:40 am
On the principle of the matter, he stated at 111:In my judgment this reasoning [from Rohm & Haas] is persuasive, and it is supported by the subsequent judgment of the Court of Appeal in Virgin v Premium. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 11:11 am
Baker v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 2:36 pm
In Scott v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:07 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 6:50 am
United States (Fed. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 8:48 am
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for further consideration in light of Commil USA, LLC v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 4:00 am
State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:17 pm
State, 149 So. 3d 672 (Fla. 2014), and Shakes v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 4:03 pm
The Washington State Supreme Court ruled en banc yesterday in Dean v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 7:02 am
In light of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Arizona v Gant, 556 U.S. ___, 129 S Ct 1710, 173 L Ed 2d 485 (2009), which abrogated the well-established rule in New York v Belton, 453 U.S. 454; 101 S Ct 2860; 69 L Ed 2d 768 (1981) and its progeny, we must consider whether an officer's good faith reliance on case law that is later overturned may form a proper basis to avoid the operation of the exclusionary rule. [read post]
